{"id":4960,"date":"2008-04-08T18:11:41","date_gmt":"2008-04-08T17:11:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/onsoftware.en.softonic.com\/has-google-gears-failed\/"},"modified":"2025-07-02T02:32:28","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T09:32:28","slug":"has-google-gears-failed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/has-google-gears-failed\/","title":{"rendered":"Has Google Gears failed?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/articles-images.sftcdn.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2008\/04\/google-gears-logo.jpg\" alt=\"Google Gears logo\" align=\"right\" \/>It&#8217;s not very often that you have to talk about a Google product in terms of failure but is <a href=\"http:\/\/gears.google.com\/\">Google Gears<\/a> one of them? With internet connections, laptops and mobile devices now so ubiquitous, was there really any need for a Google plugin that would allow you to work offline. And with the offline versions of apps such as Google Reader and Google Docs so stripped-down, are they even worth using?<\/p>\n<p>I remember when Google Gears was <a href=\"http:\/\/onsoftware.en.softonic.com\/google-gears-up-for-web-20\/\">launched<\/a> almost a year ago getting quite excited at the prospect of downloading all my Google Reader feeds and reading them at my own leisure when not connected to the internet. I wasn&#8217;t alone either &#8211; PC World named it the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pcworld.com\/article\/id,140663-page,1-c,technology\/article.html\">most innovative product<\/a> of 2007. However, I soon realised that whenever I&#8217;m on my laptop, I&#8217;m virtually always connected to the internet wherever I am and via whatever means anyway &#8211; whether it&#8217;s my home connection, in an office, via a hotspot or dare I say it, somebody else&#8217;s open connection. I also wasn&#8217;t particularly impressed by the general functionality &#8211; it became increasingly confusing to realise whether what I was reading in Google Reader was the online or offline version, the offline version was very basic and the synching process wasn&#8217;t half as fast or as automatic as I expected it to be.<\/p>\n<p>However, what has really disappointed many users about Google Gears is simply how few applications support it a whole year after its initial release. At the time of writing, there are only a handful such as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/reader\">Google Reader<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/writer.zoho.com\">Zoho Writer<\/a> and a pretty superficial attempt on <a href=\"http:\/\/docs.google.com\">Google Docs<\/a>.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s gone wrong here? Harry McCracken of PC World identifies one of the biggest problems &#8211; that using products offline is quite simply a significantly poorer experience than using them online. I mean, if a &#8220;proper&#8221; Web 2.0 application like Adobe Air is finding it tough, what hope does a tiny plugin like Google Gears have? McCracken says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s clear that even with the advent of tools and platforms such as Gears and Adobe Air, moving online apps into the offline world is just plain hard. No current Gears-enabled app is anything like its full-blooded self in offline form &#8211; and since most of them are stripped-down compared to traditional desktop software even in their online versions, that means the offline ones are barebones at best.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>However, is it maybe being unfair to rule out Google Gears merely a year after it was launched? Is it just simply a product that&#8217;s a little too ahead of it&#8217;s time at the moment and waiting for the technology to catch up? According to one forum commenter <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/technology\/2008\/04\/07\/is_google_gears_a_flop.html#comment-1034094\">Chris Flemming<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I think perhaps it&#8217;s less of a flop than possibly ahead of its time. It&#8217;s possible that applications are waiting for application support to be built into the browser, for example Firefox 3 will provide this and it&#8217;s likely that the HTML5 standard will also include offline support. I personally use Google Reader for feed reading as none of the desktop clients supported my use model, where I require access from multiple clients; the ability to &#8220;go offline&#8221; and catch up on the train or when flying is very hand<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One major problem that Google Gears will inevitably face though is the fact that it&#8217;s simply getting easier and easier to stay online all the time. With the European Union recently <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2008\/04\/06\/business\/mobile.php\">announcing<\/a> that air passengers are allowed to use mobile phones on flights, surely internet connections will follow meaning that&#8217;s one less reason to be offline.<\/p>\n<p>Does this spell the end for Google Gears or with Firefox 3 and other &#8220;offline friendly&#8221; innovations around the corner, or is this just the beginning?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s not very often that you have to talk about a Google product in terms of failure but is Google Gears one of them? With internet connections, laptops and mobile devices now so ubiquitous, was there really any need for a Google plugin that would allow you to work offline. And with the offline versions &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/has-google-gears-failed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Has Google Gears failed?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2009,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","wpcf-pageviews":0},"categories":[],"tags":[2340],"usertag":[],"vertical":[],"content-category":[],"class_list":["post-4960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-app-subdomain-redirectiongoogle"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2009"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4960"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4960\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":336215,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4960\/revisions\/336215"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4960"},{"taxonomy":"usertag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/usertag?post=4960"},{"taxonomy":"vertical","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/vertical?post=4960"},{"taxonomy":"content-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cms-articles.softonic.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/content-category?post=4960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}