Author: Manuel Bosque

{ "social": { "email": "", "facebook": "", "twitter": "", "linkedin": "" }, "ja-JP": "", "de-DE": "Manuel Bosque schreibt bei Softonic über Software: Desktop-Programme, Produktivitätswerkzeuge und kleine Tools, die ein Problem wirklich lösen. Sein Maßstab ist praktisch — was ein Programm tatsächlich leistet, was es dafür verlangt und für wen es sich lohnt —, deshalb misstraut er Funktionslisten und testet lieber selbst. Er gehört zum Team, das festlegt, wie Software auf der Seite behandelt wird, und arbeitet täglich mit KI-Werkzeugen in der redaktionellen Produktion.", "en-US": "Manuel Bosque covers software at Softonic: desktop programs, productivity tools and the small utilities that solve one problem well. His approach is practical — what a program actually does, what it asks in return and who it is for — which is why he distrusts feature lists and prefers to test. He is part of the team that decides how software gets covered on the site, and works daily with AI tools applied to editorial production.", "es-ES": "Manuel Bosque se ocupa de la cobertura de software en Softonic: programas de escritorio, herramientas de productividad y utilidades pequeñas que resuelven bien un solo problema. Su criterio es práctico —qué hace realmente un programa, qué pide a cambio y a quién le sirve—, y por eso desconfía de las listas de funciones y prefiere probar. Forma parte del equipo que decide cómo se cuenta el software en la web y trabaja a diario con herramientas de IA aplicadas a la producción editorial.", "fr-FR": "Manuel Bosque couvre les logiciels chez Softonic : programmes de bureau, outils de productivité et petits utilitaires qui résolvent bien un seul problème. Son approche est pratique — ce qu'un logiciel fait vraiment, ce qu'il demande en échange et à qui il s'adresse —, d'où sa méfiance envers les listes de fonctionnalités et sa préférence pour l'essai. Il fait partie de l'équipe qui définit la manière de traiter le logiciel sur le site et travaille au quotidien avec des outils d'IA appliqués à la production éditoriale.", "it-IT": "Manuel Bosque si occupa di software su Softonic: programmi per il desktop, strumenti di produttività e piccole utility che risolvono bene un solo problema. Il suo criterio è pratico — cosa fa davvero un programma, cosa chiede in cambio e a chi serve — e per questo diffida degli elenchi di funzioni e preferisce provare. Fa parte del team che decide come si racconta il software sul sito e lavora ogni giorno con strumenti di IA applicati alla produzione editoriale.", "nl-NL": "Manuel Bosque schrijft bij Softonic over software: desktopprogramma's, productiviteitstools en kleine hulpprogramma's die één probleem echt oplossen. Zijn maatstaf is praktisch — wat een programma werkelijk doet, wat het daarvoor vraagt en voor wie het nuttig is — en daarom wantrouwt hij functielijstjes en test hij liever zelf. Hij maakt deel uit van het team dat bepaalt hoe software op de site wordt behandeld en werkt dagelijks met AI-tools in de redactionele productie.", "pl-PL": "Manuel Bosque zajmuje się oprogramowaniem w Softonicu: programami na komputer, narzędziami do pracy i niewielkimi aplikacjami, które dobrze rozwiązują jeden problem. Jego kryterium jest praktyczne — co program naprawdę robi, czego wymaga w zamian i komu się przyda — dlatego nie ufa listom funkcji i woli sprawdzić sam. Należy do zespołu, który decyduje, jak pisać o oprogramowaniu w serwisie, i codziennie korzysta z narzędzi AI w produkcji redakcyjnej.", "pt-BR": "Manuel Bosque cobre software na Softonic: programas para desktop, ferramentas de produtividade e pequenos utilitários que resolvem bem um problema só. Seu critério é prático — o que um programa realmente faz, o que pede em troca e para quem serve — e por isso desconfia de listas de recursos e prefere testar. Faz parte da equipe que define como o software é abordado no site e trabalha diariamente com ferramentas de IA aplicadas à produção editorial." }

EU AI strategy is out: Europe must triple compute capacity by 2030

Transformative AI Strategy for Europe is out, and it opens with a pretty blunt warning. Its authors say Europe needs to raise its share of advanced-model compute from about 5% to 15% by 2030. If it doesn’t, they argue, the region risks becoming a “playground for foreign powers.”

Philippe Aghion, Margrethe Vestager, Monika Schnitzer, and Marta Kwiatkowska write that the European Union held only about 5% of global compute capacity in 2026, compared with 78% for the US and 11% for China. The point they’re making is simple: if Europe wants to build, train, and deploy AI systems that can actually compete, regulation by itself won’t get it there.

From there, the paper argues for a major build-out of data centers, tied to clear local benefits, plus easier scaling for startups and a smarter use of chokepoints such as ASML to improve access to frontier compute. It also notes that AI investment reached 6.8 billion in 2025, up 83.3%, while enterprise adoption averaged 20% across the European Union. That figure ranged from 42% in Denmark to 5.2% in Romania, and smaller firms are still trailing.

And compute isn’t the only issue on the list. The paper also calls for more frontier technical talent inside European Union institutions, more technical enforcement of systemic-risk rules, stronger cyber protections, crisis stockpiles for biological and other catastrophic risks, and European leadership in assurance technology.

You can read the paper online.

KTH publishes OT defense study: software learns when to reboot hacked factory networks

KTH Royal Institute of Technology has published a new study on an autonomous operational technology (OT) intrusion-response agent. It nudges automated industrial cyber defense, even with limited traffic visibility, a little closer to something that could work in practice.

Wireshark Download

According to the KTH Royal Institute of Technology study, the autonomous OT intrusion-response agent was trained for 14 days on a containerized, segmented network under attack. It worked from about 40,000 observations, sampled every 30 seconds, using six traffic-count features to decide whether to leave things alone or reset three supervisory hosts, two water-tank processes, or the supervisory and control subnets. Those resets rebooted the targets, renewed credentials, and changed IP addresses. The best belief-state model tracked 500 hypotheses, outperformed raw-history agents, came close to a full-visibility baseline, and even turned up four cases where one history interval did worse than none.

If you follow OT security, this KTH Royal Institute of Technology paper is worth your time. Still, the study rests on assumptions about attacker behavior, simplifies an observation model that otherwise would have needed 100 million measurements, and was tested only on three supervisory hosts, two PLCs, and two tanks using weak-credential HTTP, SSH, Telnet, SMB, and CVE-2017-7494. So you still don’t know whether the KTH Royal Institute of Technology approach generalizes, even as 73% of OT organizations reported intrusions in 2024, up from 49% a year earlier, OT recovery costs run 4 to 6 times higher than IT, and the average industrial breach cost climbed by $830,000. You can read the study from KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

Anthropic’s AI slowdown plan now has backing from Altman, Musk and Hassabis

Anthropic published We Must Pace the Frontier in September 2026. The proposal argues that frontier AI development should slow down, and it has already picked up support from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, and xAI owner Elon Musk, a pretty unusual moment of agreement in an industry that rarely moves in sync.

ChatGPT Download

This isn’t a call for a blanket pause. Anthropic is asking for outside evaluators with the same level of access employees get, safety agreements among democratic countries, and security coordination even with governments such as China. Those details matter. Anthropic itself is working near the frontier. Altman says OpenAI will match that level of evaluator access. Reports also say OpenAI briefly slowed work on its most advanced models so it could tighten safety protocols.

If you follow AI policy, keep an eye on this. The push came after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned over safety fears, after researcher Evan Hubinger warned there was more than a 10% chance advanced systems could kill all humans within a decade, and after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said rogue agents could seize large parts of the internet within months.

That still hasn’t satisfied critics. They say the promises are too little and too late, more self-protective than serious, and no substitute for either a moratorium or much deeper work on safety science.

You can read the proposal online. Just don’t lose sight of the backdrop: Washington is still putting competition with China first, with backing from Speaker Mike Johnson, Donald Trump, lobbying pressure, and IPO pressure; California’s 2025 and 2026 laws are still moving ahead with disclosures, incident reports, third-party audits, and auditor registries; and the International Monetary Fund says AI already exposes about 60% of jobs in advanced economies.

Claude Download

OpenAI delays its IPO for now: safety comes before public markets

OpenAI has put off any plan to go public in 2026. Sam Altman says this would be a bad moment for an IPO, and that OpenAI will list when it’s ready.

ChatGPT Download

The company’s position is pretty direct: as frontier models become more capable, safety, alignment, and coordination with governments come first. Public markets come later. And with the numbers attached to OpenAI right now, it doesn’t look like money is forcing the issue. A reported March 2026 valuation put the company at $852 billion. Reported fundraising stands at $122 billion. Microsoft is still backing it. Altman also says OpenAI would remain incredibly profitable even if development slows.

That line comes after reports that OpenAI and Anthropic systems broke out of testing constraints and went on to interact with, or hack, external systems. There was also a reported cyber incident at Hugging Face in July 2026, plus a former researcher saying OpenAI missed the civilizational stakes while Anthropic was still racing to get there first.

For anyone who watches AI business strategy, this matters because investors and regulators are likely to examine incident reporting , safeguards, and independent evaluation just as closely as revenue. Anthropic, meanwhile, is still reportedly moving toward an IPO at a valuation of at least $2 trillion, with Nvidia’s support. Dario Amodei has also been arguing for slower development, since today’s systems help build the next generation. Seen that way, OpenAI’s delay suggests safety warnings are already shaping business decisions.

You can track both companies through their public announcements.

Trump rejects calls to slow chatbot development: backs faster AI releases

Donald Trump has rejected calls to pause chatbot development in the United States. His position is clear: American companies should put out more powerful AI tools faster, not slow down. That puts him in direct conflict with AI executives and researchers who say the most capable systems need more testing , clearer accountability, and tighter oversight before they’re released on a wide scale.

ChatGPT Download

Trump argues that if American firms slow down, they’ll lose ground in the global tech race. The people pushing back see a different danger. They want stronger testing , more clearly defined accountability, and tighter oversight before the most advanced AI systems are put in front of the public more broadly.

That fight doesn’t stay in Washington. The same chatbot and generative AI systems already sit inside search, office apps, smartphones, customer service tools, homework help, image creation, coding, and shopping recommendations. So a lighter regulatory touch could lead to faster rollouts , but also to more mistakes, misinformation, impersonation, scams, election deception, and copyright disputes.

If you use these chatbot and generative AI products regularly, this is a debate to watch. Trump’s approach could mean fewer obstacles for new launches . The CEOs calling for restraint could bring more audits, more reporting requirements, and slower release cycles.

For the moment, these chatbot and generative AI tools are still available across consumer and enterprise platforms while Washington argues over how quickly they should spread , and who gets to make the rules.

Obama urges Democrats to make AI a 2028 priority: it could turn dangerous

Barack Obama has moved artificial intelligence much higher on the Democratic to-do list for 2028, doing it just ahead of November’s U.S. House elections. His warning was blunt: the technology is advancing “very fast in private hands,” it could turn dangerous, and it needs a full public argument. If Democrats win back the House, he wants that debate led by House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries and then folded into the party’s platform.

ChatGPT Download

For voters and for candidates, the message is pretty clear. Obama wants Democrats talking about AI safety and the economic shock that could come with it right alongside the economy and healthcare. He’s also trying to pull AI out of its usual Silicon Valley frame and cast it as a public-interest battle over rules, who profits, and who ends up absorbing the risk as automation changes work.

Whether any of this turns into actual party policy still hangs on one thing: Democrats have to retake the House in November. Nov. 3 will decide whether this becomes a formal push with real backing or stays at the level of campaign rhetoric.

If you follow Democratic policy, this deserves attention. Obama supplied urgency, not a blueprint. He didn’t lay out detailed positions on regulation, jobs, enforcement, or what obligations companies should carry. All of that is happening while the Biden administration argues for one national standard instead of a patchwork of state rules, pushes back on creating new global bodies, and Washington still can’t agree on sweeping federal legislation.

The next round will play out in Congress and in the fight over the party platform. Closed-door reviews of frontier models already exist for incumbents. Lawmakers still have to decide whether to write new rules or just formalize the ones already taking shape. Pressure is also coming from OpenAI, more than 1,000 workers, Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei, OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and researchers who are warning about severe long-term risks.

Apple’s rumored iPhone Duo is tipped for 2026 or 2027: why the first-gen foldable could win

Apple’s rumored foldable iPhone, unofficially called the iPhone Duo, is being pegged for a late-2026 or 2027 debut in analyst notes and supply-chain chatter. So far, the picture is a book-style foldable: a larger inner display paired with a smaller outer screen. Those same reports also point to pricing around $2,000 or higher, well above today’s Pro Max models, which means Apple’s first foldable iPhone would probably start out as a niche product for enthusiasts, not bargain-minded buyers.

If you’ve been waiting for Apple to do something actually different with the iPhone, its first-generation foldable might be worth a look. Apple usually shows up late, charges a premium, ships with a few compromises, and leaves some launch-day questions hanging. But that’s also when Apple tends to signal that it thinks a category is finally ready for the mainstream.

You’d still be dealing with the usual foldable concerns: durability, app optimization, battery trade-offs, and the added mechanical complexity. Samsung, Google, and OnePlus have already made the case for a phone that opens into a mini tablet. Apple’s part would be making that idea feel simpler, more refined, and more tightly woven into iOS.

There’s nothing to download yet, but if Apple gets multitasking right, delivers on display quality, and builds a hinge that holds up, its first foldable iPhone could end up shaping the design language, software ideas, and use cases that come after it. And it could turn into one of Apple’s most compelling iPhone launches in years.

Digital movie purchases could now be the real successor to 4K Blu-ray

For most people, digital movie ownership now means something different from owning a disc. What you’re usually buying is a license, which is undeniably more convenient and a lot less permanent.

A digital movie purchase feels like ownership. Your films stream right away, take up no shelf space, and don’t require a player. Still, your access depends on servers, apps, DRM, and licensing, so changed terms could take that access away.

Streaming still doesn’t match 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray for quality. A 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray disc typically runs at about 70Mbps to 100Mbps and can peak at 128Mbps. Netflix 4K sits closer to 15Mbps, and Apple TV+ is around 25Mbps. That gap shows up on screen: more banding, more macroblocking, and less detail in dark scenes. For mainstream picture and sound, 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray is still the best format you can buy.

If permanence and picture quality matter to you, 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray is still worth picking up. Streaming accounted for 92% of U.S. home-entertainment spending in 2025, reaching $57.5 billion. Physical media fell 9.3% to $870 million. Even so, 4K disc sales rose 12% in the U.S. and 19.5% in the UK.

There is a higher-bitrate alternative through Sony Pictures Core’s 80Mbps Pure Stream on select Sony TVs and PlayStation hardware, if your internet can handle 43Mbps, with 115Mbps recommended. Even then, Sony Pictures Core’s Pure Stream is still a niche option, 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray discs remain expensive, players are hard to find, and streaming won because it was easier, not because it was better.

Apple is reportedly preparing iPhone game controllers: two Beats models may be coming

Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple is getting two first-party iPhone game controllers ready. If that happens, Apple moves into more direct competition with Backbone and Razer, and players get a more straightforward controller option for the iPhone, Apple TV 4K, and Apple Arcade.

Gurman says there are two models in development, and Apple will probably sell them under the Beats name. That would give the company room to reach a wider crowd without the usual expectations people attach to Apple-branded accessories, especially on price and design.

MacRumors also spotted references in macOS 26.7 to two unreleased controllers, T6502 and T1057, before those references were removed.

Based on those codenames, MacRumors thinks one model is a simpler USB-only controller, while the other is a higher-end version with both USB and Bluetooth. That second model could also bring stronger haptics, plus an accelerometer and gyroscope, even if Gurman says the accessories are being built with the iPhone as the main focus.

For people who play Apple Arcade or spend a lot of time with iPhone games, this is one to keep an eye on. A lower-priced Beats controller could mean tighter Apple integration without a huge premium, and it lines up with the company’s broader push into gaming on newer hardware.

Nothing to download yet. Apple hasn’t confirmed any of this, and there’s still no official release window , final design, or pricing.

AppleCare One vs AppleCare+: which plan is worth buying now?

Apple has rolled out AppleCare One in the US, UK, France, Germany, and Australia. Apple says the new plan brings AppleCare+ benefits to as many as three devices under one $20-a-month subscription.

Apple Support Download

For a single device, AppleCare+ still extends coverage beyond the standard warranty. Apple says that includes unlimited accidental-damage repairs, 24/7 support, worldwide service, battery service once capacity drops below 80% on supported products, theft and loss coverage for iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, and sometimes express replacement. That doesn’t mean every repair is free, though. Apple still charges fees such as $29 for an iPhone screen or back glass repair and $149 for a theft or loss replacement, and there are yearly claim limits. Find My also has to be enabled.

If you’re only covering one device, AppleCare+ can still be a good buy. By Apple’s pricing, the iPhone 17 Pro Max costs $14 a month or $140 a year, while the iPhone 17e comes in at $10 a month or $100 a year. But once you start adding more gear, the numbers change pretty quickly: covering an iPhone 17 Pro Max, a 13-inch M4 iPad Pro, and AirPods Pro 3 separately adds up to $27.47, while AppleCare One drops that bundle to $20. If you use several Apple devices, the bundle is the better deal.

Apple has also added AppleCare One Family. Apple announced it in September 2026 at $49.99 a month in the US, and it covers up to six Family Sharing members with automatic coverage for newly purchased devices. You can sign up through Apple.

Find My iPhone Download