Miro v Joost

Joost logoTwo of the biggest TV apps out there are Joost – from the makers of Skype – and Miro which was formerly known as Democracy Player. Both have their hardcore supporters and denouncers and both have their pros and cons. Although I was initially impressed with Joost – surely one of the best attempts at offering a dedicated scheduled Internet TV service yet – I’ve gravitated back to Miro and here is why.

Miro is open source which immediately curries more favour with certain sectors of the IT savvy crowd. It can be modified and improved by its users while Joost is a closed source program that only the makers can improve. Miro offers thousands of channels from around the world which is way more than Joost although the disadvantage is that none of it is programmed or scheduled. In others words, you have to make your own programming schedule whereas with Joost, you can sit back, relax and enjoy the show. The problem is, if you’re not interested in watching such things as the Nelly Furtado channel, your options are more limited (although I think the documentary channels are pretty good). In essence, Miro is a far more democratic media player than Joost, allowing users to choose and streamMiro channels from whatever source they wish and even create their own content. However, as I say, if you’re more interested in just vegging out than getting interactive, you’ll prefer Joost.

The other major two major aspects of Miro that appeal to me are that you can subscribe to channels with RSS feeds and save broadcasts. I don’t always want to tune in to see what’s on but viewing a feed is a far simpler and convenient solution. And since I can record programs on TV with my Video or DVD player, then I should have every right to do the same on my PC media players which Miro allows you to do no problems.

From a usability perspective, Miro also wins me. Joost is much more commercial in comparison, bloated with Flash graphics, buttons and worst of all, advertisements. Although the ads are minimal in Joost at the moment, they are sure to increase as the audiences go up.

I don’t want to come across as an open source fanatic but on balance and for my needs, Miro comes out on top. However, Joost is still very much a work in progress and in some ways, different anyway because if offers a programmed schedule of viewing. Maybe if it combines the best of both one day, I’ll start using it more regularly again.

A first look at Miro

MiroYesterday we brought you the news that Democracy Player would be relaunched as Miro. Today, we can finally test the newly released version of the Internet TV application. Although not a major update, the soon-out-of-beta release has a number of significant improvements like keyboard shortcuts, an improved system tray, a better bug reporter (essential for a program still in beta), and the Veoh.com search engine has been added. The developers at PCF have also taken care of a number of bugs. Maximizing the window will not cover the task bar, importing has been increased and will now avoid audio files. Oddly enough, Yahoo has also been removed as a search engine, but if you really like it, you can still add it manually.

The new design looks like it has been slightly improved. The logo itself is much sleeker than the old one. In terms of performances I still found it a bit sluggish at startup and when opening up new feeds. The program used up around 80 Mb of memory, which I think is reasonable for an Internet application streaming videos though.

In a sense, I get the feeling that the real updates have been carried out more on the site itself, with a new redesign, new forums and a new channel guide, than on the application. With version 1.0 right around the corner, let’s hope the next release of Miro will have a bit more to offer.

Democracy to be relaunched as Miro

Democracy logoThe Democracy TV broadcasting platform is about to be renamed as Miro after about a year and a half of development. Over the past year, Democracy users had been plagued by constant updates as work on developing Miro continued under its guise. First impressions of Miro are good according to NewTeeVee who tested it out saying:

The near-final Miro build I’ve played with for the last three days is easy to use. Once you’ve got your favorites all queued up you can sit back and enjoy full-screen internet TV. My biggest complaint is about search and discovery – it’s limited to indexes of video-sharing sites.

Unlike Joost, Miro will not be limited by the number of channels available – it aggregates channels from around the internet grouped by subject and topic. At the moment, the channel list stands at 1,500 but a consequence of this is that the TV guide is apparently painfully slow to load. One particularly cool feature is that it will download BitTorrent RSS feeds automatically meaning this truly opens up the audiovisual waves in true democratic spirit.