DCEU movies ranked from worst to best

There are good DCEU movies? You’ll have to read to find out!

Superman

While Marvel kept making hit after hit with its cinematic universe, DC just never seemed to get it right. While some of the films have small, cult followings, most people agree that pretty much every film in the DC Extended Universe is hot garbage. 

From bad casting, to bad writing, to REALLY bad special effects, there is a lot of muck to sift through. However, the DCEU does have a shining light amongst all of the trash. What is that shining light you may ask? You’ll just have to read to find out.

DCEU movies ranked from worst to best

7. Suicide Squad

Suicide Squad
#NotMyJoker

This movie is about as far from “squad goals” as you can get.

“Suicide Squad” was a movie that was ruined by its production team. Basically, the MCU was making tons of money with movies that were universally loved. The DCEU was turning into a laughing stock after “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” deflated any interest fans had in the series.

In an attempt to regain the support of fans, the DCEU filmmakers decided that the smartest thing to do was to make “Suicide Squad” more like an MCU movie. Halfway through the making of “Suicide Squad,” Warner Bros. spent millions of dollars to make the movie more “lighthearted.” 

What was the result? One of the worst superhero movies ever created.

The movie made next to no sense. It’s about Amanda Waller (played by Viola Davis) wanting to create a league of meta-humans that would be able to take down a Superman-level threat. The problem is that her plan is stupid!

First off, trying to make a team of heroes out of a bunch of villains is a horrible idea. Aside from Enchantress, none of the members of the Suicide Squad really seem that threatening. The rest of the members just feel like a typical Tuesday for Batman.

Also, adding Harley Quinn to the squad (who has nothing to bring to the table) just means that you will have Joker on your tail. Speaking of the Joker…

This was the worst on-screen Joker we have ever seen. When we first saw him with his tats and grills, we knew something was wrong. Think about it: can you picture the Joker, the most clinically insane individual on the planet, sit perfectly still for multiple tattoos? The answer is “absolutely not.”

From the awful story, to the poorly executed characters, to the sub-par action, “Suicide Squad” failed to be DC’s saving grace and instead became their ultimate nightmare.

6. “Justice League”

Steppenwolf
Who even remembers this guy’s name?

Let’s go back to 2012 when “The Avengers” was coming to theaters. At the time, it was one of the most highly anticipated movies in history. For the most part, it lived up to the hype. However, when looking back on the MCU as a whole, it was a bit middle-of-the-road. Despite all of that, the movie still made a boatload of money and was the MCU’s highest-grossing film at the time.

When “Justice League” came to theaters, it had one of the worst box offices in the entire DCEU. This was absolute proof that the hype was dead. Fans have been begging for a Justice League movie for years. Even though we finally got one, fans knew that these filmmakers were going to screw it up. As much as the fans didn’t care, the filmmakers clearly cared even less.

The movie was awful. It had an incredibly forgettable villain, a forgettable story, and beloved characters played by forgettable actors. Heck, when crafting this list, we actually forgot this movie was even made!

The movie just seemed incredibly poorly timed. Only half of the members of the Justice League had prior movies establishing their characters. Flash, Cyborg, and Aquaman had none of that. Instead, the filmmakers had to hope that the people that actually came to see this trash were all fans of the comics and had done their research. Unfortunately, even if you read the comics, you were going to still be confused throughout the movie.

It’s not as unwatchable as “Suicide Squad,” but it’s two hours of your life that you’ll never get back. 

5. “Aquaman”

Ocean Master
I didn’t know Shredder from Ninja Turtles was in this movie!

“Aquaman” felt like it was made by a bunch of frat boys one step away from flunking out of school. The movie is basically just one-liners and Jason Momoa smoldering for the camera. Just watch this:

The acting is absolutely atrocious. If “Game of Thrones” taught us anything about Jason Momoa, it’s that he is at his best when he isn’t talking. Every line out of the lord of the bro-cean’s mouth is ridiculously cheesy.

The movie actually did exceptionally well at the box office. Thanks to foreign ticket sales, the movie made more than $1 billion. 

That’s not to say that the movie isn’t garbage. It’s painfully hard to get through. Do yourself a favor let this flick sink to the bottom of the ocean.

4. “Man of Steel”

Superman
The S stands for “Sucks,” because this movie really really sucks.

Superman is a hard character to get right.

He’s a god living among men and he’s trying to find out how to fit in the world. To be fair, that’s what “Man of Steel” explores. The only problem is that it gets everything wrong in the process.

While Superman struggles to find his purpose in “Man of Steel,” we as the audience struggle to get through the movie. “Man of Steel” was the first movie in the DCEU, and boy-oh-boy did it give it a rocky start. Need an example? Watch the most pointless death in any superhero movie:

The movie is infamous for being overly dark, joyless, and even colorless.

The main problem with the movie is that they hired the brainless robot Henry Cavill to play Superman. He’s definitely no Christopher Reeve, but he’s also just not a very good actor. Granted, the writers don’t give him much to work with:

If you think Cavill’s acting as Superman is hokey, just take a look at Michael Shannon as General Zod:

Director Zac Snyder watched that line delivery and said, “Yeah, that was good. Let’s go with that take.”

“Man of Steel” could have been the start of DC’s golden age of comic book movies. Instead, it was the start of a long series of disappointments.

3. “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice”

Lex Luthor
Could you imagine what would’ve happened if HIS mother’s name was Martha?!?!

It’s really easy to hate this movie.

From start to finish, “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” is poor decision after poor decision. From casting Jesse Eisenberg to play Lex Luthor, to the world’s greatest detective falling for a middle school level scheme, to… “Martha,” the movie is awful.

You’re probably asking yourself, “If this movie is so bad, then why is it so close to the top?” Well, a lot of it has to do with the fact that it doesn’t have much in terms of competition. Secondly, the movie does have a few redeemable qualities. First off, Ben Affleck does a phenomenal job as Batman. The character’s worst qualities clearly aren’t Affleck’s fault, but the fault of the writers.

Secondly, although a lot of the action is pretty lame, this scene is awesome:

This one scene of Batman kicking butt is the best action scene in the entire DCEU. 

What made this movie rub so many people the wrong way is because this could have been the greatest superhero movie ever created. Buried beneath all of the bad CGI and awful writing there is a good movie somewhere in here.  Those who watch DC’s animated movies will tell you just how good “The Dark Knight Returns” is. The two movies contain what most agree is the best on-screen confrontation between the Son of Krypton and Bat of Gotham.

Dawn of Justice couldn’t even channel a fraction of that film’s energy, and instead became the living meme we all know today. 

The film’s biggest issue lies in how much it tries to cram in. It has to establish Batman, establish Lex Luthor, create the Batman versus Superman story, set up the Justice League, introduce Wonder Woman, introduce and execute Doomsday, and then play out the Death of Superman storyline. It fails on all accounts and just comes off as a bloated mess. 

2. “Wonder Woman”

Ares
Eat some chocolate, Professor Lupin. You’re not you when you’re hungry.

“Wonder Woman” is far from a perfect film. However, it does deserve most of the praise it gets.

The story and characters were the best the DCEU had given us by far up until this point. Wonder Woman was likable, and she was thrown into a story that made perfect sense for her character. 

The movie plays a lot like “Captain America: The First Avenger,” as it takes place during a World War with the main character out to defeat the overwhelming German forces. However, it is also a fish-out-of-water story as Wonder Woman struggles to learn how to live in our world after being raised with the Amazons. In this sense, it’s a lot like “Thor.” 

The movie does have two pretty big issues. The first is the special effects. A lot of the action scenes look pretty bad.

Gal Gadot’s fight choreography is fine, but when she jumps around fighting people, the special effects look about as convincing as middle school theater. 

The second worst part is the villain. Wonder Woman believes that the God of War Ares (sorry, Kratos) is the cause of all the suffering going on in the world. At first, it looks like Ares isn’t real. At this point, you think the movie is going to actually be pretty smart by showing that humans are flawed and that there aren’t always supernatural causes for our misdoings. However, Ares then reveals himself resulting in quite possibly the worst villain casting of all time.

Who was chosen to play the God of War? Why, Professor Lupin from Harry Potter, of course!

He isn’t the least bit threatening. He looks like a complete dork throwing a hissy-fit. Rather than feeling scared, you just laugh at the screen as the poindexter tries to act all-powerful.

All in all, “Wonder Woman” is a decent flick by DCEU standards, but it is far from a great superhero movie.

1. “Shazam!”

Shazam
My face when I made a better movie than Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Joker, and Aquaman.

If you were to have gone back in time to when we were in elementary school and would’ve told us, “In the future, there is going to be an Aquaman movie, a Batman vs. Superman movie, and a Justice League movie, but they’re all going to suck. However, there is going to be an awesome Shazam movie,” we would’ve called you insane.

However, that was exactly the case. “Shazam!” is a blast from start to finish. The DCEU filmmakers decided that rather than trying to make a cinematic universe, a dark film, or a something monumental, they would just make something fun. “Fun” is the best way to describe this flick.

If we had to nitpick at one part of the movie, it would be the special effects. Sometimes the movie looks like a PlayStation 2 game.

The dogs in “Ghostbusters” look more convincing.

However, it doesn’t take away from the rest of the film.

Zachary Levi does a great job of playing a child in a superhero’s body. He’s believably cocky and arrogant while also being hilariously awkward when trying to interact with people.

The main character Billy Batson is a likable kid with a rough past. It’s very easy to get invested in him and to root for him to succeed. When he gets his powers, he does what any other kid with superpowers could do; he tests them and makes YouTube videos. This results in quite possibly the best scene in the entire DCEU:

If “Shazam!” were an MCU film, we would probably put it between “Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 2” and “Spider-Man: Far From Home” on our list. The fact that we think this movie is better than almost half of the movies in the MCU is crazy given the fact that pretty much everything else on here would plummet to the bottom of the list.

“Shazam!” is far from a perfect movie, and it is nowhere near the level of movies like “Avengers: Endgame.” However, it is easily the best movie the DCEU has to offer. 

Wrapping up

If you happened to like one of the movies we ripped apart, more power to you. We’ll just agree to disagree. There are a ton of Marvel movies with issues, but the DCEU just seems to get it wrong over and over again. With that being said, we would like nothing more than to see great movies involving these characters. 

The main thing DC needs now is time. The movie industry is so saturated with superhero flicks that DC needs to wait for things to die down before throwing their hat back into the ring. Once some time has passed, they should be able to get some fresh ideas on what to do with these beloved characters.

Got a different opinion? Head over to our Softonic Solutions topic to share your voice!

Why the Marvel Cinematic Universe works (and others don’t)

Why did the Avengers succeed while the Justice League flopped? Find out now!

Cap Thanos

The enormous success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe cannot be overstated. In just a few weeks, “Avengers: Endgame” has passed “Titanic” as the second highest grossing movie of all time, and is rapidly approaching “Avatar’s” number 1 spot. In fact, MCU movies make up half the spots of the top 10 highest box office grosses ever.

This brings us to the billion dollar question, “How did Marvel overtake mega-franchises like Harry Potter and Star Wars with characters that were once barely a blip in pop culture? Also, why have all the other cinematic universes failed to match its success?

Why the Marvel’s Cinematic Universe works (and others don’t)

Building a universe (in a cave with a box of scraps)

iron man 2008 start of mcu

In the 1990s, Marvel, like most comic book companies, was facing financial ruin. After filing for bankruptcy, Marvel attempted to save itself by selling off the film rights to its most popular characters.

Movie studios jumped at the chance to gain the rights to cultural powerhouses like Spider-Man and the X-Men (whose film rights were sold to Sony and Fox, respectively). Other Marvel characters, while beloved for decades by dedicated comic audiences, failed to break into the mainstream pop culture sphere. Characters like Thor and Iron Man are objectively cool, but they didn’t have the same draw as characters like Spidey or Wolverine.

After the breakout successes of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man franchise and Fox’s X-Men series, Marvel decided to take out a loan of $500 million to create Marvel Studios. The idea behind Marvel Studios was that Marvel could use some of the lesser-known characters from its comic history to create a shared cinematic universe.

If the venture failed, the studio could simply liquidate itself and sell the film rights to its remaining characters to interested studios. Still owning the rights to the majority of the Avengers characters (most notably Captain America and Hulk), Marvel Studios attempted a bold strategy. They decided to make individual films of various characters before smashing them together in a massive blockbuster.

It was a bold and untried strategy at the time. Sure, studios had dabbled in crossing over their characters to modest success, (such as “Alien vs. Predator” or “Freddy vs. Jason”) but no studio had ever attempted to create a massive crossover universe out of an established property on this scale.

The only thing that was even close was the Universal Classic Monsters. From the ’20s through 1960, Universal created films with several monsters like Frankenstein’s Monster, Dracula, and the Wolf Man. From time to time, characters and their respective actors would cross over into other films. It was arguably a framework for the MCU, but it was a loose framework.

Marvel was the perfect property for this experiment, as the company had been crossing over its characters in the comics for decades.

Marvel Studios began with “Iron Man,” who was supposedly chosen to receive his own film due to his massive toy potential. The movie’s large budget, B-list main character, and at-the-time leperous main star Robert Downey Jr raised eyebrows among industry experts, who predicted a flop. In fact, Kevin Feige said Downey’s casting was the toughest fight he had with Disney. The 2008 movie was, as we all know, a massive success. It ended up singlehandedly recouping Marvel’s $500 million loan, convincing Marvel to move on with their experiment. The film made about $585 million, according to IMDb.

Iron Man’s approach to a cinematic universe was subtle. The film stood on its own, peppered with references to a larger universe (S.H.I.E.L.D, Nick Fury, the Avengers Initiative, etc) for hardcore Marvel fans to salivate over. The continued success of character films like “Captain America: The First Avenger” and “Thor” maintained Marvel’s momentum until the release of the groundbreaking first Avengers film in 2012.

In building up to “The Avengers,” Marvel focused on telling self-contained stories with compelling characters first, and on connecting these characters in a shared universe second. By making these formerly unknown characters worthy in the eyes of the public, they drummed up interest for their eventual crossover. It’s this sense of patience that allowed for Marvel to craft its cinematic universe into something that was worth keeping up with. Their system of “phases” made sure that every crossover paid off in a big way.

Avengers

By building up audience confidence in their brand, Marvel was able to successfully dive deeper into their character library. Eventually, they pulled out then-unknown characters like Black Panther, Ant-Man, Doctor Strange, and the Guardians of the Galaxy. While the rival DCEU hoped that the enduring legacies of Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman would lead to massive box office success, Marvel built character legacies from the ground up.

With more than 20 movies in its universe, it can be hard to avoid audience fatigue. However, Marvel successfully navigated this by switching up genres and directors within its films. The films can range from spy-thriller (“Captain America: Winter Soldier”), heist-comedy (“Ant-Man”), cosmic misfit comedy (“Guardians of the Galaxy”), to Afrofuturist epic (“Black Panther”). Marvel’s signature style of loose dialogue and lighthearted, self-aware tone allowed them to create a consistent brand amongst its wide variety of characters without becoming repetitive.

Marvel Studios president and MCU brainchild Kevin Feige has stated that each movie is made for its own individual story first.

While the grand crossover outlines are there, directors and writers are given plenty of freedom to craft their own stories. This, along with Marvel’s patience in getting audiences invested in its characters, is the main reason the MCU has seen the success that it has. It builds naturally to crossover events instead of shoving a crossover movie in your face that tells you, not shows you, that these characters are important.

Why are other cinematic universes struggling?

justice league dceu

The runaway success of 2012’s “The Avengers” caught the attention of studio heads from across the world. The potential profits of a cinematic universe were massive, and every studio with recognizable characters immediately scrambled to follow Marvel’s lead. The most notable of these was, of course, DC.

With the release of 2013’s “Man of Steel,” DC had seemingly followed the formula set by “Iron Man:” create a standalone story with only cursory references to a larger universe. Unfortunately for DC, “Man of Steel” received only lukewarm reviews, with critics and audiences lamenting its dreary tone and color palette.

Sensing danger, DC decided to immediately move forward with its cinematic universe, or rather DC Extended Universe. DC continued with director Zack Snyder, whose bleak and pseudo-deep subversions of superhero narratives were clearly not resonating with audiences. The next film was “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” a film that was somehow overlong, stuffy, and unearned.

The movie immediately thrust new versions of Batman and Wonder Woman onto the big screen, failing to slowly build up the hype of a major crossover event.

By the time “Justice League” rolled around, DC showed that it still hadn’t learned how to properly build up a cinematic universe. It introduced more characters to the big screen without buildup (Aquaman, Flash, and Cyborg,) rapidly attempting to play catch-up with Marvel to no avail. It would have been ludicrous to think only 10 years ago that a movie starring a talking raccoon and a tree would become a cultural phenomenon while the Justice League’s long-awaited big-screen debut would get a lukewarm reception.

By not trusting audiences and slowly building up their characters, DC made their crossover movies feel like any old superhero movie instead of a massive crossover event. This, combined with DC announcing dozens of movies that have barely made it past development hell, shattered audience faith in DC to make a coherent cinematic universe.

DC has started to regain goodwill with their solo movies like “Wonder Woman,” “Aquaman,” and “Shazam!”  They are clearly moving away from lofty, pseudo-intelligent Snyder epics and more towards contained, tightly made stories. This has granted them significantly more critical and financial success, so it’s likely DC will focus on solo films for the near future.

Other cinematic universes have come and gone in the MCU’s lifetime. The X-Men franchise served as a sort of predecessor to the MCU, but its wildly inconsistent quality and haphazard continuity prevented it from fully achieving its potential.

Universal recently attempted combining their classic horror monsters into a modern cinematic universe known as the Dark Universe. Spearheaded with “The Mummy,” an action-packed Tom Cruise vehicle, the Dark Universe failed to take off before it really even started. Instead of creating a self-contained story that took place in a bigger world, “The Mummy” aggressively beat audiences over the head with setup for sequels and crossovers.

I mean come on, people; remember when they released a trailer for the movie without music?

This unsubtle, inauthentic buildup pushed audiences away, and the myriad of announced Dark Universe films are currently nowhere to be seen.

A particularly bold move is crossing over a bunch of properties that have nothing to do with each other (besides them all being owned by the same company). Hasbro is attempting to do this with its various properties such as GI Joe and Rom the Spaceknight. Hanna-Barbera is currently working on something similar with Scooby-Doo, Captain Caveman, and Wacky Races. It’s hard not to be cynical about mashups like these, as they seem to be brainchildren of studio executives throwing every remotely popular property they have into a blender. They are unfortunately completely skipping over the carefully laid groundwork of the MCU.

Wrapping up

All in all, the safest way to create a cinematic universe is simply to copy the foundation of the MCU. Create a bunch of compelling individual characters and then cross them over once audiences actually care. Do not simply throw a bunch of recognizable characters together, hoping it’ll have the same impact.

Planning must be careful and slow, and the studio must balance out their grand plans with the desires of individual filmmakers to craft independently satisfying films. If you can strike this balance successfully, you end up with the MCU. If you fail, you’ll simply land on top of the pile of other cinematic universe attempts.

Robert Pattinson is the next Batman… we’re being serious

Taking the cape and cowl from Ben Affleck, the next Batman is set to be our favorite sparkly vampire.

Robert Pattinson BatmanMichael Keaton. Christian Bale. Ben Affleck.

These are actors who can play both an intimidating vigilante as well as an extravagant billionaire with grace and excellence. Say what you will about their shortcomings as Batman,  each actor in their own right brought their own unique flair to the character, while still being a badass superhero.

For the next iteration of the caped-crusader, Warner Bros. has chosen this guy:

That’s right. For better or worse, the next Batman is going to be the sparkly vampire himself, Robert Pattinson.

Pattinson will don the cape and cowl in a new Batman film coming out in 2021. The film simply titled, “The Batman” is being directed by Matt Reeves. 

With Reeves, we see a glimmer of hope. Reeves directed both “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” and “War for the Planet of the Apes,” and both of those movies were awesome.

The last actor to play Batman in a live-action movie was Ben Affleck. Affleck played the role in “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice,” “Suicide Squad,” and “Justice League.” Although Affleck will not be returning to reprise his role in “The Batman,” he has been credited with writing an early screenplay for the film. Given the fact that Affleck is an Oscar-winning writer, his name attached to the project can’t hurt.

Most fans agree that despite all the faults of the DC Extended Universe, the one saving grace was Affleck’s performance.  You know… when he wasn’t being stupified by hearing “Martha:”

We’re going to try to go into this as optimistically as possible.

Yeah, Pattinson has been in some stinkers, and he’s not our first choice for who we’d like to see play Batman. However, he’s come a long way from seducing high school girls in his vampire make-up.

Pattinson has had some challenging roles that show he can take on a more macho persona. For example, in 2017’s “Good Time,” he plays a criminal who goes through New York City’s violent underground in order to get his brother out of prison.

Sure, the role is a far cry from Batman, but it’s a step in the right direction. Also, the actor has dropped hints that he was less than thrilled with his character in the Twilight films. 

Look, we might be grasping at straws, but we just want a decent live-action Batman movie. Most of everything else from the DC Extended Universe has been a stinker.

Man, here we thought the news about Chris Rock reviving the Saw franchise was random and weird.

We’re keeping our expectations low for this one, but we truly are hoping for the best. If Pattinson is great, then we will be happy. If not, we still can watch and enjoy both “Batman” and “The Dark Knight” any day of the week.

‘Batwoman’ gets its first trailer

The CW’s trailer for ‘Batwoman’ is here, and it makes ‘Flash’ look like ‘Citizen Kane’

Batwoman

Well, at least the costume looks okay.

The CW Network released the first trailer for its new show “Batwoman,” and boy, does it look rough.

Where do we even start? How about the complete lack of color? 

DC has this idea that because it is so dark and edgy, everything has to be colorless in its TV and movie adaptations. Here’s the problem though, fans hate it!

In the DC Extended Universe, the films are panned beyond belief for having zero-to-no color. In fact, fans have color corrected the movies just to show how much better they can look.

Even the comics know how to combine dark storytelling with color and character.

Killing Joke
Source: Batman: Killing Joke

Speaking of the characters, they stink in this trailer.

Batwoman’s alter ego is Kate Kane. In the trailer, she exudes girl power in every move she makes. That’s fine, but Kane is so much more than just girl power. Kane is probably the biggest LGBT superhero ever created. In the comics, she inspired so many readers to be true to themselves.

Batwoman girlfriend

Kane was inspired by the disappearance of Batman, and her overwhelming sense of justice to fight for Gotham. Her sexuality and feminity were present but played a backseat to her overall character. She’s an analytical genius and a martial arts master who becomes the new greatest detective in Gotham.

The Batwoman in the trailer, played by Ruby Rose, has none of the same character. She comes off as arrogant and self-centered. When she finds out her love interest has been kidnapped, she looks concerned for all of two seconds, and is then cocky the rest of the trailer.

We can’t take the situation seriously because she isn’t taking it seriously.

She just appears to annoy every character she’s with in every scene. There’s never a point where anyone looks happy to see her, or that she looks the least bit interested herself. Yeah, she kicks some butt here and there, but Batman has this thing about actions defining people:

And the dialogue is… not great.

“So I have this thing with rules.”

“I’m not gonna let a man take credit for a woman’s work.”

“You’re a female Bruce Wayne.” (HOW! HOW DOES SHE ACT ANYTHING LIKE HIM!)

DC Universe Online Download now ►
7

The show looks like it was made by a bunch of people who never left the punk/grunge era. Kane looks like she got into a fight with her parents when she wanted to get a nose ring, and often exclaims, “You just don’t get it!” Give it five episodes and we guarantee you’ll hear a Nirvana song. 

Look, there are much worse DC titles out there. For goodness sake people, “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” exists. We’re not gonna get much worse than that.

However, this show doesn’t look like it has much to offer aside from some fun action here and there. It doesn’t look like it’s going to capture any of what made the Batwoman comics great, and instead looks like it will embody all the things wrong with DC’s movies and shows.