What happens when the police software designed to prevent crimes… doesn’t prevent any crimes?

Predictive policing is the trendy field of policing that uses data collection and analysis to try to predict where crimes may occur.

Predictive policing, the trendy field in law enforcement that utilizes data collection and analysis to try to predict where crimes will occur, has been very popular among police departments in the United States.

Netflix DOWNLOAD

Unfortunately, this technology has not always been proven to work well. In fact, a new study, published this week, seems to suggest that, in at least one case. It’s been a total waste of time… and money.

A new joint investigation by The Markup and Wired shows that, for the city of Plainfield, New Jersey, predictive policing has been a gigantic and expensive mess, producing almost no useful results.

Spending money on useless software? Yes, please

Both outlets analyzed a large dataset provided by the Plainfield police, which included around 23,631 predictions made by Geolitica, a crime prediction software.

Geolitica (formerly known as PredPol but changed its name two years ago) claims to use “data-driven strategies” to help police identify so-called “hotspots,” meaning the places where crimes are more likely to occur.

However, the dataset provided by the Plainfield Police revealed that (over a period of approximately ten months, between February 25 and December 18, 2018) the software accurately predicted where crimes would occur with an almost 0% success rate.

Gizmodo and The Markup previously collaborated on an investigation into PredPol software, discovering that police were disproportionately targeting low-income communities of color using the technology.

The English outlet attempted to contact Geolitica to inquire about the study’s findings but was unsuccessful. The company is slated to cease its operations by the end of this year; some of its team members have already been hired by other companies.

Netflix DOWNLOAD

Author: Chema Carvajal Sarabia

{ "de-DE": "Journalist, spezialisiert auf Technologie, Unterhaltung und Videospiele. Über das zu schreiben, was mich begeistert (Gadgets, Spiele und Filme), ermöglicht es mir, bei Verstand zu bleiben und mit einem Lächeln im Gesicht aufzuwachen, wenn der Wecker klingelt. PS: Das stimmt nicht 100% der Zeit.", "en-US": "Journalist specialized in technology, entertainment and video games. Writing about what I'm passionate about (gadgets, games and movies) allows me to stay sane and wake up with a smile on my face when the alarm clock goes off. PS: this is not true 100% of the time.", "es-ES": "Content Manager - Periodista especializado en tecnología, entretenimiento y videojuegos. Escribir sobre lo que me apasiona (cacharros, juegos y cine) me permite seguir cuerdo y despertarme con una sonrisa cuando suena el despertador. PD: esto no es cierto el 100 % de las veces.", "fr-FR": "Journaliste spécialisé dans la technologie, le divertissement et les jeux vidéo. Écrire sur ce qui me passionne (gadgets, jeux et films) me permet de rester sain d'esprit et de me réveiller avec le sourire aux lèvres quand le réveil sonne. PS : cela n'est pas vrai 100 % du temps.", "it-IT": "Giornalista specializzato in tecnologia, intrattenimento e videogiochi. Scrivere di ciò che mi appassiona (gadget, giochi e film) mi permette di mantenere la sanità mentale e di svegliarmi con un sorriso sul viso quando suona la sveglia. PS: questo non è vero al 100% del tempo.", "ja-JP": "", "nl-NL": "", "pl-PL": "", "pt-BR": "Jornalista especializado em tecnologia, entretenimento e videogames. Escrever sobre o que me apaixona (gadgets, jogos e filmes) me permite manter a sanidade e acordar com um sorriso no rosto quando o despertador toca. PS: isso não é verdade 100% do tempo.", "social": { "email": "chemacs91@gmail.com", "facebook": "", "twitter": "https://twitter.com/chematopetazo", "linkedin": "" } }