Canada bans the use of WeChat and Kaspersky by its officials due to “espionage risk”

Canada has decided to become stricter in granting access to applications from certain countries. WeChat, the dominant Chinese super application, and Kaspersky, the Russian antivirus software, will not be allowed on devices used by public officials in the North American country.

As stated in a statement, the Canadian government questions the reliability of these two applications and, amid suspicions of espionage through these services, has decided to take decisive action and do away with both WeChat and Kaspersky. There are plenty of alternatives to these services, so the quality of life for officials should not be significantly affected by the absence of these two applications.

WeChat DOWNLOAD

Privacy risks

While the Canadian government mentions the security and privacy issues surrounding these services, WeChat has not commented on the matter. However, given that WeChat is primarily focused on the Chinese audience, the Western market is not its priority. On the other hand, the Chinese government regrets the “ideological issues” behind this ban.

Kaspersky, on the other hand, has expressed dissatisfaction with the news. According to Reuters, the Russian cybersecurity company was not notified about the Canadian government’s concerns regarding its privacy, something they claim they would have addressed had they known about it. However, there is no turning back, and starting from November 6th, their services will be removed from all government devices.

The era of digital bans

One doesn’t have to dig deep to realize that many countries accuse companies or applications from other nations of espionage. Often, these situations arise not from clear signs of privacy breaches but rather when tariffs on products or services with international origins and destinations are not accepted. As a result, there was, for instance, Donald Trump’s trade war against Huawei, a conflict that continues under Biden’s administration.

Furthermore, companies that tend to provoke such “trade wars” are also economic rivals on the global stage. Therefore, when countries like the United States or Canada seek to limit services from Russia or China, it’s more about economic and political interests than the accusations of security breaches or espionage they use as justifications to sever commercial ties.

WeChat DOWNLOAD

Facebook payments and beyond — why big tech is slowly taking over our wallets

A monster disruption to the banking industry is coming.

internet money

Fintech startups have been working to overtake the stronghold of traditional banks on the financial services industry for several years at this point.

And to some extent, they’ve been successful. However, it’s the so-called “platform companies” that banks need to keep an eye on.

McKinsey and other consulting groups have warned the financial sector that Amazon, Facebook, and others are poised to shake up the space in a way that fintech just couldn’t swing.

And there’s the fact that a growing number of millennials believe that tech companies could feasibly wipe out traditional institutions and replace them with their own take on financial products.

Every so often, new moves by Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook make headlines for their latest foray into finance. Think Apple Pay or Facebook’s relationship-building attempts with banks.

But, what’s on the horizon? Are we looking at a future where we buy our homes on Amazon or apply for auto loans using a social credit score?

Here’s a look at what’s happening with the platforms.

How big tech is making a play for your wallet

Convenience and branding bring big advantages

According to an Accenture survey from 2016, one in three banking and insurance customers would consider switching their accounts over to Google, Amazon, or Facebook if it were an option. And a report from Bain and Co. suggests tech companies are succeeding where alt-finance failed for a few reasons.

For one, tech firms already have the name recognition, trust, and the massive customer base required to drive change. Fintech startups, by contrast, had more niche appeal than anything and can be hard for the average consumer to understand.

It makes sense that Amazon could start successfully offering loans alongside bulk paper towels and unauthorized beauty supplies. It’s easy.

As American tech companies are wading into the banking space, Asian companies are diving in. Japan’s Rakuten, the country’s largest online marketplace and messaging app, already offers credit cards, mortgages, and securities services.

China’s Alibaba also functions as a lender and payments processor and AliPay and WeChat Pay are massively popular payment platforms that sidestep traditional banks altogether.

From Facebook to Apple, what’s big tech got planned for our wallets?

Facebook started dabbling in payments back in 2015 and hired PayPal’s CEO to lead its messaging products group and added the ability to send payments to friends across the platform.

Then last year, the social networking behemoth enhanced the platform by allowing people to use PayPal as a funding source.

Which—fine. Square Cash and Venmo work more or less the same way. Plus, PayPal made similar deals with Slack and Skype anyhow.

But over the past year or so, the noise about tech giants making a play for the banking space has gotten louder—which left us wondering, is something big planned?

In August, we learned that Facebook was trying to climb deeper inside our collective wallets, and now, Amazon and Apple are doing the same.

Apple is in the midst of launching a credit card with Goldman Sachs, while Amazon is working on a peer-to-peer payments function where you can just tell Alexa to send money to a friend.

The big push into finance makes a lot of sense. Americans are increasingly using online banking—as well as taking advantage of convenience from things like Venmo, mobile deposits, and so on.

Facebook’s whole deal was more about streamlining existing payment platforms than creating their own payments infrastructure.

The benefit for Facebook is, despite the fact that they’re not creating new products, they will gain access to new datasets. And that’s where banks will lose if they don’t embrace automation and faster processing.

Why banks need to worry about losing data

data

When you move small payments and transactions into Facebook Messenger or the WhatsApp chat box, it’s those apps reap the real reward: data.

And banks, of course, lose out on that valuable resource.

While it sounds like a real “who cares” situation, there might be a cost down the line.

When banks don’t have data, they have a hard time developing new financial services and delivering accurate risk mitigation. Meaning, we might have to place our trust in big tech instead.

And after Facebook’s myriad privacy gaffes, it might be a pretty big risk. On the customer side, those who continue to use traditional financial products may see lower quality offerings.

For example, it’s harder for banks to identify risks without access to large datasets—which could impact investments down the line.

Final thoughts

While we’re still enamored with our devices, many of us are starting to look at tech giants through a similar lens as we viewed big banks and Wall Street.

Platform companies have huge power as it stands. They’ve provided the infrastructure powering the gig economy and the sharing economy, which have had significant ripples throughout the economy-economy.

While financial products are bound to get better when reimagined by tech, there’s the risk that too much power falls in the hands of this small group of companies. Banks need to respond with better products and an improved customer experience — or risk the same fate as taxis or travel agents.