Facebook crushed with $5 billion fine for privacy issues

Facebook has to pay the largest fine ever imposed by the FTC due to their privacy issues.

ZuckerbergFacebook privacy scandals are a dime a dozen. However, it looks like those dimes have added up to a $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission. 

The fine was part of a settlement agreement between the FTC and Facebook, and it is the largest fine the FTC has ever slapped on a tech company.

What’s the full story?

In 2018, millions of Facebook users’ data landed in the hands of politically motivated actors in what has come to be known as the Cambridge Analytica Scandal. The data was used for politcal advertising purposes. This fine is largely in response to that scandal.

However, this also leads back to a promise Facebook made in 2011 and has since failed to keep.

In 2011, Facebook admitted to having deceived users about the privacy of their data. Facebook reached a settlement with the FTC and agree to be transparent about what was happening to their data, ask for consent before sharing their data, and give prominent notice before it was shared. 

If you’ve been paying attention to the news, you’d know that Facebook fails to keep this promise all of the time. 

What’s $5 billion to Facebook?

Yes, $5 billion is an insane amount of money. The fact that it is the largest fine ever imposed by the FTC to a tech company is also pretty crazy. The runner-up isn’t even in the same ballpark: Google had to pay $22.5 million in 2012. However, $5 billion is a drop in the bucket for Facebook as a whole. 

Mark Zuckerberg is worth more than $70 billion himself, and Facebook as a whole is worth more than $100 billion. Heck, Facebook made about $55 billion in 2018 alone. 

That’s right. Facebook is worth more than a ransom from Dr. Evil.

Let’s take a look at the numbers:

Facebook compromised data from 87 million of its users. That means that the company is paying about $57 for every user’s privacy they failed to protect.

Don’t you think your privacy is worth more than that?

(function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(d.getElementById(id))return;js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=’https://embed.playbuzz.com/sdk.js’;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}(document,’script’,’playbuzz-sdk’));

Facebook’s other issues

The FTC has been probing Facebook for more than a year after the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In that time, government agencies have unearthed even more concerning details about the social media giant.

It almost seems like every week there is a new story that pops up about Facebook being involved in another scandal concerning privacy. Heck, we’ve covered so many that it’s kinda crazy:

Wrapping up

This is a step in the right direction, but Facebook still has a boatload of other privacy issues that they need to rectify. With nearly a third of the world’s population on Facebook, they need to be held to a higher standard to keep the privacy of their users safe. 

Zuckerberg knew about Facebook’s privacy issues and did nothing to stop them

In 2012, Facebook knew about an app that could steal millions of users’ data and did nothing to fix the problem.

Mark Zuck

Emails show that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg had prior knowledge of Facebook’s privacy issues, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal.

One of the emails from April 2012 is deeply concerning. It shows Zuckerberg and Facebook insiders learning about a third-party app that took data from tens of millions of Facebook users while ignoring Facebook privacy policies.

The app was eventually suspended, but sources told the WSJ that this did not cause Facebook to look into their privacy issues.

Keep in mind that this was six years before millions of users had their data compromised in the Cambridge Analytica Scandal. It was also long before we knew about other apps that were stealing our data without our knowledge. 

To clarify, none of the emails appear to show Zuckerberg deliberately disobeying Facebook policy. However, they do show a huge lack of responsibility and respect for Facebook users. 

The emails were discovered by a probe from the Federal Trade Commission and were later reported by the WSJ.

Our take

Recently, Zuckerberg has been pushing privacy for Facebook. He wants to add more tools so users can be protected on Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram.

Although some were inclined to believe him, this news suggests that Zuckerberg is only doing so because Facebook was caught with its pants down.

Your privacy and personal data should be your top concern when you’re on social media, and Facebook’s users deserve to be on a platform where the company has the same concern.

Deepfake Zuckerberg video tests Facebook policy

Deepfake videos can heavily influence voters, but will Facebook do anything to stop them?

Zuckerberg

“Imagine this for a second: One man, with total control of billions of people’s stolen data, all their secrets, their lives, their futures. I owe it all to Spectre. Spectre showed me that whoever controls the data, controls the future.”

Those sinister words came from the mouth of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg… or so you’d think. The video was actually a deepfake made for a much different purpose. Take a look.

How will Facebook respond?

The deepfake video was made to challenge Facebook’s policy for removing fake content. Recently, the social media giant was in hot water for not removing a manipulated video of Nancy Pelosi. 

Facebook has been trying to do more to stop the spread of fake news. They have increased their reporting tools for users so that they can work quickly to get the content flagged.

That Pelosi video had millions of views. Although Facebook eventually labeled the video as “fake,” they did not remove it from the site. However, the video got thousands of views before getting flagged. Now, Facebook is left to figure out if they will remove the video, and how long will they wait before they take action.

Many individuals, including Pelosi herself, called out Facebook for not removing that video. However, Facebook stuck by its guns.

“If it was the same video, inserting Mr. Zuckerberg for Speaker Pelosi, it would get the same treatment,” said Facebook director of public policy Neil Potts at a parliamentary hearing.

With this new deepfake video of Zuckerberg, we will see if what Potts said was true. Will Facebook let the video stay up? Or will it take a different stance when the CEO is the target?

How to spot deepfake videos

Fake news

With the next presidential election on its way, deepfake videos could potentially sway thousands of voters. Luckily, researchers from Dartmouth College are creating software that can help spot deepfake videos.

Essentially, the software analyzes hours of authentic footage of political influencers like Pelosi, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. The software pays attention to things like how their head moves, speech patterns, and facial expressions so that it can tell if something is authentic.

According to the researchers, the software is about 95% accurate, but they are optimistic that they can get it up to 99% within the next six months. Until detection software can outpace the fake video producers, a quick trick is to look at the eyes. Deepfake-created humans almost never blink.

Facebook shareholders vote to overthrow Zuckerberg (it doesn’t work)

Shareholders vote for a new Facebook chairman. Why won’t it work?

Zuckerberg

Nearly 70% of Facebook’s shareholders voted to reduce Mark Zuckerberg’s power in the company. This was revealed in a recent filing from Facebook from their shareholder meeting.

Last year, 51% of shareholders voted for an identical proposal. This year, even more Facebook stock owners are tired of how Zuckerberg has been conducting business.

Shareholders are upset with Zuckerberg over several major Facebook scandals. If you’re wondering what scandals they’re referring to, we can name a couple:

What do the shareholders want to do?

Shareholders are hoping to hire an independent chairman to hold Zuckerberg and his top team accountable.

Essentially, the shareholders are tired of Zuckerberg and his team not being held accountable. Hiring a chairman could put forward a set of checks and balances that would keep them from causing more harm to Facebook and its users.

7

Is anything going to come from this?

No.

The issue with hiring a chairman to oversee Zuckerberg is that he owns 60% of the company’s voting power. Zuckerberg and his team voted against hiring an independent chairman, so it’s not happening. Basically, no matter what the majority of shareholders propose, Zuckerberg always gets the final word.

This goes to show the importance of a chairman. Despite Zuckerberg’s majority voting power, a chairman could potentially approve or disapprove decisions made by Zuckerberg and his team. This would provide a new layer of accountability sorely needed at Facebook.

Should Zuckerberg not have as much power?

If you keep up to date with Facebook news, you’d know that there seems to be a new story about a Facebook scandal every week. Although Facebook will make a claim from time to time that they’re trying to make a change, the constant scandals speak for themselves.

To make matters worse, some scandals involved Zuckerberg’s direct actions.

Although Zuckerberg might be the founder of Facebook, his actions might continue to put the company in peril. If Facebook wants to outweigh the negative news with positive news, then they are going to need to make changes like these.