Marvel’s Avengers game paints a world without Captain America

Marvel’s Avengers brings Earth’s mightiest heroes together to face a new threat!

Captain America

If you were looking for a reason to buy a PlayStation 4, this might be it!

Square Enix has released the first trailer for Marvel’s Avengers where you save the day as Earth’s mightiest heroes. 

The game is set to come out on May 15, 2020 for both the PS4 and Xbox One. However, you can play the beta version now on PS4. The game will also be available for Google Stadia, which is set to come out in November of this year.

Did… Did Cap just die?

Iron Man Thor

Come on Marvel, we are still getting over Iron Man‘s death in the MCU.

The game starts during a celebration of the Avengers. While unveiling a new high-tech headquarters, an explosion causes the Avengers to take action. While fighting off bad guys and tanks, Captain America jumps aboard a helicarrier to dispatch baddies. However, a massive explosion not only causes massive civilian casualties but the death of Cap himself. 

After his death, the remaining Avengers are blamed for the tragedy. As a result, the Avengers disband. However, five years go by and the remaining Avengers spring back into action to face a new threat.

Is Cap going to stay dead? Well, we don’t think so. Cap has died in the comics before and has come back. Also, it appears as though you do play as Cap at the beginning of the game, so we don’t think the game developers would create unique fighting mechanics for Cap, just to not have him in the game later.

Sorry Hawkeye, maybe later

In the game, you appear to play as Iron Man, Hulk, Thor, Black Widow, and Captain America. There are no signs of other Avengers like Hawkeye, Doctor Strange, or Spider-Man.

However, this does provide an opportunity for lots of DLC.

With the huge cast of Marvel characters, we would love to see all of these characters join the fray to help save the world.

What’s gameplay and what’s a cut-scene?

HulkThe trailer does not specify what is actual gameplay and what is a cutscene. Scenes of the Avengers talking together or doing very cinematic scenes are probably cutscenes, but most of the combat looks like genuine gameplay. However, we will have to wait for the next trailer to know for sure.

A stellar voice cast

In order to make a great Avengers game, you need a great cast of actors and actresses. Luckily, Square Enix has given us an absolutely stunning array of voice actors.

In a tweet, the voice cast was revealed:

  • Iron Man: Nolan North
  • Bruce Banner: Troy Baker
  • Black Widow: Laura Bailey
  • Thor: Travis Willingham
  • Captain America: Jeff Schine

You probably know Nolan North best for voicing Nathan Drake in the Uncharted series. Troy Baker has quite the resume himself including the voice of Joel from The Last of Us and Booker Dewitt from Bioshock Infinite. Laura Bailey has provided the voice for Black Widow in several animated Avengers shows. She also voiced Mary Jane Watson in Insomniac’s Spider-Man game. Travis Willingham has been providing the voice for Thor in animated series for years. Jeff Schine has provided voices for Kingdom Hearts III, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Just Cause 4. 

Avengers assemble!

If this is half the game Marvel’s Spider-Man was, then we are in for a treat. We are already excited for Ultimate Alliance 3, but this might just be even better!

Why ‘Endgame’ Thor is so important

Here’s why Thor is the heart and soul of “Avengers: Endgame.”

Endgame Thor

* SPOILERS BELOW *

People deal with grief in different ways, and many of them are not healthy. Marvel’sAvengers: Endgame” starts Thor off in a bad mental place, where he is stewing in his failure to properly behead the mad Titan. He’s off in the corner of the room, not saying a word, and when it comes time to face Thanos again he decapitates him before the rest of the team is ready. He flies off and that’s the last we see of the thunder god until five years later – five years that were less than kind to him.

The ending of “Avengers: Infinity War” is the biggest tragedy in the history of the universe. Billions of organisms (remember, it’s all life; not just people) are turned to dust. The Avengers failed to save the day. The bad guy succeeded in his plan, and then he got away. They didn’t even get to ‘avenge’ the fallen properly. It’s a crippling blow for our heroes’ morale, and for Thor, it was even worse since, at least in his mind, he’s the only one who might have been able to stop Thanos (“should’ve gone for the head”). It was a particularly bad time for the Asgardian to fail once again. We’re shown a candid perspective of Thor’s mental place before he forges Stormbreaker during a conversation with Rocket. Even as far back as then, the poor guy really needed some therapy:

Tasteless jokes?

We go from Thor in the above scene to the aforementioned dark and brooding Thor at “Endgame’s” start. Then we shift to five years later when he’s put on some pounds, let his hair grow unkempt down to his shoulders, and, as War Machine puts it, “has Cheez Whiz running through his veins.”

After the emotional turmoil of “Infinity War” this is how we approach Thor? Jabs at his weight and insensitive remarks? It wasn’t the decision to make Thor fat that caused such a backlash from fans; it was the constant jokes made at his expense. Was fat Thor a weak attempt to inject some humor into an otherwise dark story?

fat Thor Avengers Endgame
Thor drowning his sorrows in what looks like some delicious guacamole.

Thor faces new challenges

Thor is depressed. Not only that, it’s a welcome example of depression being portrayed in a realistic way: Thor isn’t sitting in the dark alone and crying. He’s with his friends; he’s laughing, he’s partying. But when it comes time step up and face the trauma that’s digging at him, he is stubborn and afraid.

On the character’s evolution, director Anthony Russo voiced that Thor’s arc in “Endgame” is one of his favorites. “It’s so devious and subversive,” he said proudly, “when comedy is coming from a place of complete commitment and emotional complexity.” It’s an unexpected turn for the normally godlike character, and it shows one of the angles that Stan Lee was most keen to convey: It’s not your powers or prowess that make you a superhero; it’s who you are as a person.

Thor: Ragnarok Chris Hemsworth shirtless
This shirtless scene in “Thor: Ragnarok” was played for a much different effect.

The main villain of “Iron Man 2” wasn’t Whiplash or Justin Hammer. It was Tony Stark and his own personal issues. Thanos is still a huge threat in “Endgame,” but the first two acts of the film are more about showing how our heroes deal with failure. Thor is an excellent example of this deeper, internal conflict, and Chris Hemsworth was not afraid to play it to its limit. “I like that anything goes. You’re not locked into expectations,” he said. “I enjoyed that version of Thor. It was so different than any other way I played the character. And then it took on a life of its own.”

Originally, the intent was that Thor would regain his godlike physique before the final showdown with Thanos. However, Hemsworth stressed that he would instead like the character to remain overweight, a sentiment that a more lazy actor would never have voiced; putting on that fat prosthetic was no cakewalk (pun slightly intended). “It was certainly exhausting,” said the actor. “I had weights on my hands and ankles just to have my arms and legs swing differently when I shuffled along through the set. Physically, it was a good three hours in hair and makeup. Then the prosthetic suit, particularly for the shirt-off scene, that was a big silicone that weighed about 90 pounds.” The decision to keep “fat Thor” throughout the movie is one of the defining reasons we think the choice was made for more than just cheap comedy.

Why it’s so important

There isn’t one right way to be hero, and everyone deals with depression differently. Thor’s at his lowest point – where can he go from there? “Endgame” screenwriter Christopher Markus reflected that “we wondered ‘okay, well, what if he does become a sort of depressive alcoholic?’ And the weight gain was just part and parcel of that state of mind. We didn’t go, like, ‘let’s chunk him up; it’ll be hilarious.’ I think he is the ideal Thor at the end of the movie, and he’s carrying some weight.”

Thor Dr. Strange beer
Thor’s alcoholism didn’t come from nowhere. It makes sense that depression would ramp it up.

Thor’s got a problem for sure, but it’s his mental state. It isn’t his weight. For all the snipes and jokes made at the expense of his bloated figure, the action on-screen never presents Thor’s bulging stomach as an actual problem. It’s merely a symptom of the mental illness he’s struggling to live with. To emphasize that point, Thor is still able to summon Mjolnir during the scene with his mother, Frigga. “I’m still worthy!” he cries out in surprise.

When Thor comes out to face Thanos during the final fight, he’s not magically thin. He’s got his beard in a neat braid, he’s got lighting coursing through his body, and he’s as strong as ever. He needed to get back in the fight mentally. He needed to face his demons firsthand. He didn’t need a treadmill and a stalk of celery. The fact that there intentionally is not a physical transformation for Thor speaks volumes about the Directors’ decision: Depression and apathy don’t have anything to do with body weight, and neither does curing it.

Thor’s character arc has taken him to a new, unexpected place of power and self-confidence. As per his mother’s advice, he’s stopped trying to be the person he’s supposed to be, and started becoming who he is.

As for what’s next for the thunder god, Hemsworth excitedly stated “I’d still love to do more, to be honest. And I don’t know what the plan is. I feel like we’ve opened up such a different character. I feel more energized for the possibility of where it could go.”

Endgame Thor Mjolnir Stormbreaker
Thor is stronger now than ever before. Ever ‘BeThor?’

Does this mean he’ll be keeping the weight in what the character endearingly called the “Asgardians of the Galaxy?”

Let us know in the comments below if you’d like to see more “fat Thor” in future films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and we’ll see you in theaters for “Spider-Man: Far From Home!”

Why the Marvel Cinematic Universe works (and others don’t)

Why did the Avengers succeed while the Justice League flopped? Find out now!

Cap Thanos

The enormous success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe cannot be overstated. In just a few weeks, “Avengers: Endgame” has passed “Titanic” as the second highest grossing movie of all time, and is rapidly approaching “Avatar’s” number 1 spot. In fact, MCU movies make up half the spots of the top 10 highest box office grosses ever.

This brings us to the billion dollar question, “How did Marvel overtake mega-franchises like Harry Potter and Star Wars with characters that were once barely a blip in pop culture? Also, why have all the other cinematic universes failed to match its success?

Why the Marvel’s Cinematic Universe works (and others don’t)

Building a universe (in a cave with a box of scraps)

iron man 2008 start of mcu

In the 1990s, Marvel, like most comic book companies, was facing financial ruin. After filing for bankruptcy, Marvel attempted to save itself by selling off the film rights to its most popular characters.

Movie studios jumped at the chance to gain the rights to cultural powerhouses like Spider-Man and the X-Men (whose film rights were sold to Sony and Fox, respectively). Other Marvel characters, while beloved for decades by dedicated comic audiences, failed to break into the mainstream pop culture sphere. Characters like Thor and Iron Man are objectively cool, but they didn’t have the same draw as characters like Spidey or Wolverine.

After the breakout successes of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man franchise and Fox’s X-Men series, Marvel decided to take out a loan of $500 million to create Marvel Studios. The idea behind Marvel Studios was that Marvel could use some of the lesser-known characters from its comic history to create a shared cinematic universe.

If the venture failed, the studio could simply liquidate itself and sell the film rights to its remaining characters to interested studios. Still owning the rights to the majority of the Avengers characters (most notably Captain America and Hulk), Marvel Studios attempted a bold strategy. They decided to make individual films of various characters before smashing them together in a massive blockbuster.

It was a bold and untried strategy at the time. Sure, studios had dabbled in crossing over their characters to modest success, (such as “Alien vs. Predator” or “Freddy vs. Jason”) but no studio had ever attempted to create a massive crossover universe out of an established property on this scale.

The only thing that was even close was the Universal Classic Monsters. From the ’20s through 1960, Universal created films with several monsters like Frankenstein’s Monster, Dracula, and the Wolf Man. From time to time, characters and their respective actors would cross over into other films. It was arguably a framework for the MCU, but it was a loose framework.

Marvel was the perfect property for this experiment, as the company had been crossing over its characters in the comics for decades.

Marvel Studios began with “Iron Man,” who was supposedly chosen to receive his own film due to his massive toy potential. The movie’s large budget, B-list main character, and at-the-time leperous main star Robert Downey Jr raised eyebrows among industry experts, who predicted a flop. In fact, Kevin Feige said Downey’s casting was the toughest fight he had with Disney. The 2008 movie was, as we all know, a massive success. It ended up singlehandedly recouping Marvel’s $500 million loan, convincing Marvel to move on with their experiment. The film made about $585 million, according to IMDb.

Iron Man’s approach to a cinematic universe was subtle. The film stood on its own, peppered with references to a larger universe (S.H.I.E.L.D, Nick Fury, the Avengers Initiative, etc) for hardcore Marvel fans to salivate over. The continued success of character films like “Captain America: The First Avenger” and “Thor” maintained Marvel’s momentum until the release of the groundbreaking first Avengers film in 2012.

In building up to “The Avengers,” Marvel focused on telling self-contained stories with compelling characters first, and on connecting these characters in a shared universe second. By making these formerly unknown characters worthy in the eyes of the public, they drummed up interest for their eventual crossover. It’s this sense of patience that allowed for Marvel to craft its cinematic universe into something that was worth keeping up with. Their system of “phases” made sure that every crossover paid off in a big way.

Avengers

By building up audience confidence in their brand, Marvel was able to successfully dive deeper into their character library. Eventually, they pulled out then-unknown characters like Black Panther, Ant-Man, Doctor Strange, and the Guardians of the Galaxy. While the rival DCEU hoped that the enduring legacies of Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman would lead to massive box office success, Marvel built character legacies from the ground up.

With more than 20 movies in its universe, it can be hard to avoid audience fatigue. However, Marvel successfully navigated this by switching up genres and directors within its films. The films can range from spy-thriller (“Captain America: Winter Soldier”), heist-comedy (“Ant-Man”), cosmic misfit comedy (“Guardians of the Galaxy”), to Afrofuturist epic (“Black Panther”). Marvel’s signature style of loose dialogue and lighthearted, self-aware tone allowed them to create a consistent brand amongst its wide variety of characters without becoming repetitive.

Marvel Studios president and MCU brainchild Kevin Feige has stated that each movie is made for its own individual story first.

While the grand crossover outlines are there, directors and writers are given plenty of freedom to craft their own stories. This, along with Marvel’s patience in getting audiences invested in its characters, is the main reason the MCU has seen the success that it has. It builds naturally to crossover events instead of shoving a crossover movie in your face that tells you, not shows you, that these characters are important.

Why are other cinematic universes struggling?

justice league dceu

The runaway success of 2012’s “The Avengers” caught the attention of studio heads from across the world. The potential profits of a cinematic universe were massive, and every studio with recognizable characters immediately scrambled to follow Marvel’s lead. The most notable of these was, of course, DC.

With the release of 2013’s “Man of Steel,” DC had seemingly followed the formula set by “Iron Man:” create a standalone story with only cursory references to a larger universe. Unfortunately for DC, “Man of Steel” received only lukewarm reviews, with critics and audiences lamenting its dreary tone and color palette.

Sensing danger, DC decided to immediately move forward with its cinematic universe, or rather DC Extended Universe. DC continued with director Zack Snyder, whose bleak and pseudo-deep subversions of superhero narratives were clearly not resonating with audiences. The next film was “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” a film that was somehow overlong, stuffy, and unearned.

The movie immediately thrust new versions of Batman and Wonder Woman onto the big screen, failing to slowly build up the hype of a major crossover event.

By the time “Justice League” rolled around, DC showed that it still hadn’t learned how to properly build up a cinematic universe. It introduced more characters to the big screen without buildup (Aquaman, Flash, and Cyborg,) rapidly attempting to play catch-up with Marvel to no avail. It would have been ludicrous to think only 10 years ago that a movie starring a talking raccoon and a tree would become a cultural phenomenon while the Justice League’s long-awaited big-screen debut would get a lukewarm reception.

By not trusting audiences and slowly building up their characters, DC made their crossover movies feel like any old superhero movie instead of a massive crossover event. This, combined with DC announcing dozens of movies that have barely made it past development hell, shattered audience faith in DC to make a coherent cinematic universe.

DC has started to regain goodwill with their solo movies like “Wonder Woman,” “Aquaman,” and “Shazam!”  They are clearly moving away from lofty, pseudo-intelligent Snyder epics and more towards contained, tightly made stories. This has granted them significantly more critical and financial success, so it’s likely DC will focus on solo films for the near future.

Other cinematic universes have come and gone in the MCU’s lifetime. The X-Men franchise served as a sort of predecessor to the MCU, but its wildly inconsistent quality and haphazard continuity prevented it from fully achieving its potential.

Universal recently attempted combining their classic horror monsters into a modern cinematic universe known as the Dark Universe. Spearheaded with “The Mummy,” an action-packed Tom Cruise vehicle, the Dark Universe failed to take off before it really even started. Instead of creating a self-contained story that took place in a bigger world, “The Mummy” aggressively beat audiences over the head with setup for sequels and crossovers.

I mean come on, people; remember when they released a trailer for the movie without music?

This unsubtle, inauthentic buildup pushed audiences away, and the myriad of announced Dark Universe films are currently nowhere to be seen.

A particularly bold move is crossing over a bunch of properties that have nothing to do with each other (besides them all being owned by the same company). Hasbro is attempting to do this with its various properties such as GI Joe and Rom the Spaceknight. Hanna-Barbera is currently working on something similar with Scooby-Doo, Captain Caveman, and Wacky Races. It’s hard not to be cynical about mashups like these, as they seem to be brainchildren of studio executives throwing every remotely popular property they have into a blender. They are unfortunately completely skipping over the carefully laid groundwork of the MCU.

Wrapping up

All in all, the safest way to create a cinematic universe is simply to copy the foundation of the MCU. Create a bunch of compelling individual characters and then cross them over once audiences actually care. Do not simply throw a bunch of recognizable characters together, hoping it’ll have the same impact.

Planning must be careful and slow, and the studio must balance out their grand plans with the desires of individual filmmakers to craft independently satisfying films. If you can strike this balance successfully, you end up with the MCU. If you fail, you’ll simply land on top of the pile of other cinematic universe attempts.

Movie trailers: what works and what fails with today’s blockbusters?

Movie trailers can be fast, fun, and filled with energy. But are they reliable?

Movie theater

We hype movie trailers just as much as we hype up the movie itself. A two-minute trailer that shows a couple of carefully selected scenes can amass hundreds of millions of views. 

Trailers have gotten so popular that they have their own major releases at events like Comic-Con, and even their own award show. 

It has come to a point where some people actually trust movie trailers more than websites like Rotten Tomatoes or even their own friends.

Trailers now go so far beyond just a simple video. Trailers are shared on a massive scale, and analyzed frame by frame. Even YouTube content creators like AngryJoeShow make a living off reacting to and dissecting movie trailers.

Clearly, trailers have a major impact on modern pop culture as well as filmmaking. So this begs the question, how do you make one?

Creating a modern trailer

According to a video from Vice News, movie trailers have ways of manipulating the viewer.

Most trailers aren’t even made by the same people that made the movie. More often than naught, an outside team that specializes in making trailers comes in to create it. According to StudioBinder.com, there’s a formula for making one. 

As common sense would dictate, trailers typically focus on a handful of the most visually appealing scenes. Then, the creators add frames and bite-sized scenes to talk about the story, the characters, or the themes of the film.

For example, let’s look at the trailer for “Pirates of the Carribean: Curse of the Black Pearl:”

The trailer focuses on the story by first showing us the Aztec gold coin and a kidnapped Keira Knightley. After that, we could the cool hero shot of Jack Sparrow, Geoffrey Rush’s character becoming a zombie, and swashbuckling sword fights.

What’s really crazy is that sometimes scenes are shot for the trailer alone. Don’t believe me? Then tell me why Hulk is in the battle at Wakanda in the “Avengers: Infinity War” trailer, but not the movie?

The directors for the film intentionally created this scene and misdirected fans. The only scene in the film featuring Hulk is when Thanos kicks his butt at the beginning.

Showing that scene in the trailer would give away a major scene in the movie. It is inaccurate to show Hulk in the battle at Wakanda, but omitting such a major character from the trailer would be a folly.

So now that we know how a trailer is made, what are some tricks that go into them?

Nostalgic movies and playing it safe

When a cherished title from our youth makes its way to the big screen, it is often a mixed bag of emotions. However, one trailer can either confirm or cast aside your doubts.

We’ve seen these trailers put unfathomable hype behind a project, and we’ve seen them kill a movie before it hits theaters. 

Let’s start by looking at a nostalgic trailer that works:

Some of us can probably remember where we were the first time we saw this trailer for “Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens.” It dropped at halftime during “Monday Night Football” nearly four years ago. In that time, it has amassed more than 100 million views and a very favorable like-dislike ratio. 

So why did this trailer work so well?

First and foremost, the trailer plays it very safe. There is nothing in the trailer that doesn’t scream “Star Wars.” There are X-Wings, TIE-Fighters, and lightsabers out the wazoo.

We get a new cast of characters, but they aren’t radically different from the main cast you might see in a different Star Wars title. We also get to see a classic character, Han Solo, give a few one-liners that send shivers down your spine. 

This trailer works so well that you could make a trailer for an older Star Wars film in the same style, and it would work. In fact, somebody did that!

You might say, “It’s Star Wars. It’s a big franchise. It will do well no matter what.”

That’s not necessarily true. Let’s take a look at another popular franchise’s trailer and see how well it did:

Yeah, we went there.

Taking apart this trailer has become beating a dead horse. Yet, here we are, mallet in hand.

The first thing wrong with this trailer for “Ghostbusters” is something we will call “nostalgia piano.” Nostalgia piano occurs when a classic tune from a series is slowed down and played one note at a time to build nostalgic hype for a movie. The theme to Ghostbusters sounds cool played like that, but at the end of the day, it’s a cheap trick.

If you think we are making up nostalgia piano, but there are plenty of examples. Trailers for “Beauty and the Beast,” “Jurassic World,” and even “Detective Pikachu” all have it. We included the trailers below with the appropriate timestamps to back it up:

Nostalgia piano was far from “Ghostbusters” biggest flaw. Heck, even the Star Wars trailer we just praised kinda uses it at the very beginning.

The trailer’s biggest flaw was the tone that deviated too far from the original. The humor from the original film came from clever writing and delivery.  The humor in the trailer was more so derived from shock humor, gross-out humor, and slapstick. Sure, Peter Venkman gets slimed. He just doesn’t go into detail about how the slime went “everywhere.”

Some believe the film was doomed from the start, but a fan’s recut of the trailer shows that the trailer might be what was at fault. The results speak for themselves.

The pacing, removal of some humor, and swapping nostalgia piano for the original theme made this a much more effective trailer. Heck, the fan cut trailer was able to be more effective in less than half of the time. 

So is the trick then for trailers to play it safe? Well, not necessarily. DC has already proved that not playing it safe is sometimes the best option.

The DC Extended Universe is infamous for being overly dark and serious in the tone of its movies. Although critics and a lot of audience members don’t like this tone, it still gets the approval of some of the hardcore audience members (in some cases). The Rotten Tomatoes scores are proof of that.

The creators of “Shazam” decided to throw dark and serious out the window with its trailer. Shazam cracks jokes, the trailer is bright and colorful, and Shazam even dances. Not only that, but “Shazam” is killing it with both critics and fans. 

So if playing it safe or not isn’t a sure fire sign of whether or not a movie will be good, how do we tell? To answer that question we are going to have to pick on DC some more:

Bashing “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice” is about as common as bashing “Ghostbusters.” However, we forget that although the first “Ghostbusters” trailer bombed, the first Dawn of Justice trailer was a smash hit. 

After watching this trailer today, it is hard to believe that the movie wasn’t near what fans or critics wanted.  The tone, action, and drama are all fitting. However, the more you look at the trailer, the more cracks you can see. 

For one, Jesse Eisenberg sticks out like a sore thumb. He feels like he wandered off the set for “Now You See Me,” and ended up in this trailer. His lines don’t work and he doesn’t reflect the tone of the rest of the film.

Wonder Woman is always a welcome sight. However, when you factor in all of the storylines the movie will have to devote time to, you can’t help but think the story will be bloated. 

We can bash bad trailers all day, and point out why they failed. However, this leads to another, perhaps,  more important question:

Do we take trailers too seriously?

When the trailer for “Sonic the Hedgehog” dropped, the internet exploded with how much people hated it.

The trailer was so bad, that the film’s director promised that they would use the months until the film’s release to redesign Sonic.

This means that the creators will be spending more money, time, and resources to redo each and every scene with Sonic. As the budget for the film is already $90 million, this could turn a big financial flop into a humiliating disaster.

It is wild to think that this expensive decision was made based on a trailer less than three minutes long. 

In our opinion, the movie that comes out should be the one that the director intended in the first place. For proof of this, we need to, unfortunately, look at “Suicide Squad.”

It’s common knowledge at this point that “Suicide Squad” was not what director David Ayer intended for it to be. The decision to make the movie more and more light-hearted came from reactions to other DC films and, yes, the trailers. 

As the trailers developed, they got less and less serious bringing in more upbeat music and energy.

Ayer was not happy with the final product of the film. He even went so far to say that he wishes he had a time machine so he could go back and fix the film with a more grounded story.

In the end, can we even make an accurate call based on a trailer?

At the end of the day, factors other than trailers should go into your decision on whether or not to see a movie.

Take a look at the first trailer for “Kingsman: The Secret Service:”

The trailer clearly misses the mark on the major themes of the movie. None of the hardcore action or crude humor can be seen in this trailer. It comes off as a spy-school story rather than the R-rated action comedy we got. Heck, we didn’t even get to see any of the incredible church scene from the movie:

WARNING: NSFW

The box office results for the movie are clear evidence that the trailer didn’t do it any favors. The film’s opening weekend revenue made up about 25% of the total revenue. Films like “Infinity War” and “Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi” made about 35% of their revenue in the opening weekend.

Basically, this hints at that more people saw Kingsman after reading reviews and hearing about it from friends than from watching the trailer.

Honestly, there’s nothing wrong with that.

If a trailer gets you hyped and excited, don’t let down your guard, but get excited. If a trailer hints at a few flaws, give it some time before you see the movie. Finally, if a trailer is awful, wait until you hear what critics and audience members had to say first. 

Which MCU weapon should you wield? (Quiz)

See what weapon best suits your personality.

Guardians of the Galaxy

The Marvel Cinematic Universe is the home of many iconic weapons – Infinity Gauntlets that can erase the universe with a single snap, swords that unlock bridges to other planets, and staffs that can take over people’s minds. There’s something for everybody, but which is the right one for you? Take our quiz below and find out which weapon from “Avengers: Endgame” you should take into combat!

(function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(d.getElementById(id))return;js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=’https://embed.playbuzz.com/sdk.js’;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}(document,’script’,’playbuzz-sdk’));

Satisfied with your choice? If not, just grab the nearest Time Stone and go for a do-over. Let us know what you got in the comments below, and we’ll see you in theaters!

If you haven’t seen it yet, you should also totally check out the new trailer for “Spider-Man: Far from Home.” Get ready for a wild ride!

Are you worthy enough to wield Thor’s hammer?

Take our quiz to see if you could pick up Thor’s mighty hammer.

Thor

“Whosoever holds this hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor.” That’s the inscription Odin placed upon Mjolnir, the infallible weapon wielded by his son, Thor. While Thor is famous for using this hammer, carrying it into battle was not his birthright. It was something he had to earn. If you can’t remember a time where Thor didn’t have his trusty Mjolnir, you might want to re-watch his first film in the MCU. Luckily for you, you can live-stream “Thor” right here!

It takes a lot of internal strength to wield Thor’s hammer, and precious few are deserving of the honor. Are you one of them? Take our quiz and discover whether your are worthy!

(function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(d.getElementById(id))return;js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=’https://embed.playbuzz.com/sdk.js’;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}(document,’script’,’playbuzz-sdk’));

Are you worthy of Mjolnir? If not, never fear; as we’ve seen in the MCU, strength can come from the most unexpected of places – don’t write yourself off yet! It may simply be time to “stop trying to be the person you’re supposed to be and start being who you truly are.” Take another crack at it when you’re feeling zen, and we’ll see you in theaters for “Avengers: Endgame!”

‘Spider-Man: Far From Home’ trailer teases multi-verse

Does this trailer mean we are getting to see more of the Spider-Verse? Let’s talk about that.

SPOILERS BELOW!

Spider-Man

As Tom Holland says at the beginning of the trailer, if you haven’t seen “Endgame” yet, stop right now. There are spoilers ahead!

After the hype train that was “Avengers: Endgame,” we are ready to hop aboard the next one with “Spider-Man: Far From Home:”

In the “Endgame” aftermath, Peter Parker needs to learn how to live in a world without Iron Man. While fighting crime across the Big Apple, Spider-Man decides to take a vacation with his friends. Around this time, Nick Fury is trying to get ahold of him, but Spidey ignores his calls.

Spider-Man Iron Man

After the events of “Avengers: Infinity War,” and “Endgame,” Peter has suffered great losses, including his own life, until being snapped back to reality (oh, there goes gravity). We may be seeing a Spider-Man who understands the consequences of being a superhero, so he may want to live life as a normal teenager for a while.

The trailer also gives us another look at Jake Gyllenhaal playing Quentin Beck/Mysterio. Beck appears to be working with Nick Fury on the side of good. He also claims to be from an alternate universe and got there after Thanos snapped his fingers. Fury wants Mysterio and Spider-Man to team up to take down threats that slipped in from alternate universes.

Mysterio

In the comics, Quentin Beck lies about being an alien from another world, so this multi-verse talk might be hot air. Our guess is that Beck is full of it, and the monsters they are facing are under Beck’s control. With Iron Man out of the picture, Beck might be trying to take the role of Earth’s mightiest hero. However, if Beck isn’t lying, then we might get introduced to a live-action Spider-Verse.

Since the trailer confirmed that the movie takes place after the events of Endgame, we now know for certain that Ned, Flash, and MJ all also died from the first snap, and were brought back by the second.

Spider-Man MJ

Peter and MJ look like they’re headed for romance in this film, but it will be taking a backseat to the rest of the story. MJ also reveals in the trailer that she knows that Peter is Spider-Man, so now, basically everyone who knows Peter also knows his secret identity. 

We’re excited for “Spider-Man: Far From Home,” and we luckily don’t have to wait too long. The movie is set to release on July 2 of this year, and we can’t wait to see it. “Endgame” was satisfying but left us wanting more. Thankfully, Spider-Man is on the way.

 

Surprise characters in ‘Avengers: Endgame’

Overcoming death and the cutting room floor of the writer’s room, several MCU characters return in Endgame.

Spoilers ahead!

Endgame Black Widow

It’s no surprise that “Avengers: Endgame” has broken box office records left and right, smashing even Infinity War in its opening week. This cinematic end to the Thanos saga ties up loose ends, delivers the climactic story we were hoping for, and brings back a lot of familiar faces.

There were some that we expected (like Cap, Iron Man, and Black Widow), and others that we were pleasantly surprised to see back on screen. Just who are those characters? We’ve put together a list.

However! This is as far as we can go without dipping into spoiler territory so here’s your final warning before reading on:

Captain America museum whisper Winter Soldier
Don’t spoil the Endgame.

Surprise characters in ‘Avengers: Endgame’

Valkyrie

Thor: Ragnarok Valkyrie

The first character we were pleasantly surprised to see make a return was Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson). She’s the able, militant, and fiercely independent warrior of Asgard who made her introduction in “Thor: Ragnarok.” Since the realm’s destruction at the end of Ragnarok, we were happy to see that some Asgardians also survived Thanos and the snap. They find a new home on Earth… in a hillside fishing village.

Oh, how the mighty have fallen.

Ragnarok Valkyrie Pegasus

While Thor is supposed to be the ruler of Asgard, he’s thoroughly shirked his duties in favor of drinking and playing Fortnite. This has left Valkyrie in charge of “New Asgard,” and Thor happily puts her in charge at the end. However, that’s not before she gets some shining moments in the battle of battles against Thanos! If you’re a Valkyrie fan, you’ll be happy to see that she’s alive and well, and proudly taking the fight to the titan himself.

Korg and Miek

Thor: Ragnarok Korg

“Hey man, I’m Korg and this is Miek. We’re about to jump on that spaceship and get out of here. Wanna come?”

Oh, yes we do, Korg. Also, we’re happy to see you.

While we’re on the subject of living Asgardians, we were excited to see that our favorite duo from “Thor: Ragnarok” also survived. The lovable Korg (Taika Waititi) and Miek are safe and sound in “New Asgard.” They are spending their time consoling the traumatized Thor and playing Fortnite.

Honestly, we’re still surprised Miek survived Korg stepping on him:

The Ancient One

Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One

The Ancient One (Tilda Swinton) from “Doctor Strange” shows up once time travel enters the mix. Bruce Banner shares a conversation with her over the need to recover the Time Stone. Rather, it’s thanks to Scott Lang’s introduction of Pym Particles and the time-bending effects of the Quantum Realm. Nevertheless, the Time Stone is needed to complete the set, and the Avengers are sent back to 2012 to snag it along with the Mind Stone and Space Stone.

The Ancient One Baron Mordo Doctor Strange

Though we didn’t know it at the time, The Ancient One was helping out during Loki’s Chitauri invasion back in the first Avengers movie. This makes sense since the Sorcerer Supreme is responsible for defending both the reality in which they live and the New York sanctum during times of crisis.

In a pretty cool scene, we get to see the Ancient One explain how branching timelines occur. She explains how if the Infinity Stones are gathered from all corners of the universe, they must be returned from whence they came. This comes into play later in the film when Captain America is tasked with returning them.

Howard Stark

Howard Stark Iron Man 2

One of the greatest scenes in the film had to be Tony Stark‘s reunion with his father, Howard Stark (John Slattery). Tony stumbles into an encounter with his father on his return to the ’70s in search of more Pym Particles with Captain America. Howard is dubious of Tony, feeling like he knows him even though they’ve never met. The fake name Tony chooses of “Howard Potts” probably didn’t help much.

Howard Stark Captain America First Avenger
Tony didn’t get to go back THIS far.

This scene provides a different kind of closure than the other tied up plot threads. Rather than explaining a cut-and-dry plot point, we instead get to see an unexpectedly touching conclusion. Now that Tony is a father himself, he connects more deeply with Howard whose own wife is about to enter have Tony. Tony gets to give parenting advice to his own dad, and the perceived coldness and hostility of their past relationship retroactively melts.

Frigga

Frigga Thor

If seeing Tony and Howard talking together wasn’t enough parent-child bonding, Thor gets a second chance too. When he and Rocket Raccoon travel back in time to recover the Reality Stone, Thor is shocked to see his mother Frigga (Rene Russo) gracing the halls.

Frigga Thor

Though he tries to hide his identity from her, Frigga sees right through it like only a mother (albeit a mother raised by witches) can. Ever since failing to “aim for the head,” Thor has been in a pretty low place. His mother is able to slap some sanity back into him though, and gives him sage advice: Stop trying to be who you’re supposed to be, and start being who you are. It’s this advice that encourages Thor to give up being Asgard’s leader and instead hand the throne to Valkyrie.

Gamora

Gamora Infinity War

“Avengers: Endgame” runs the gamut of family relationships. It touches on mother-son, father-son, and sister-sister. Gamora’s (Zoe Saldana) shocking death in Infinity War was made only worse by occurring before Thanos even snapped his fingers. This led many fans to believe that, even if the snap was undone, her death could not be reversed. Thankfully, thanks to some time travel this is not the case, and we get to see the most dangerous woman in the universe come back to help out.

Gamora Avengers: Endgame

Gamora’s character was always more complex. She served Thanos in his hunt for Infinity Stones, but never quite wanted him to find them all. Now that Nebula is a changed woman, she tells Gamora of their better relationship in the coming future. This knowledge causes her to join forces with the Avengers. She’s still not too convinced that Star-Lord was a great romantic choice, though.

Loki

Loki Thor: Ragnarok

While it may remain true that there are “no resurrections” this time, it doesn’t mean that Loki (Tom Hiddleston) isn’t alive in the past! When the Avengers go back to 2012 to steal the Mind and Space Stones, that naturally puts them in the path of the mischievous trickster god. While he doesn’t have more than a few lines, he does get to snag the Space Stone when it accidentally spills out of Tony’s hands. With it, he escapes his restraints and portals out of the scene. Where to? Most likely to wherever the upcoming Loki series takes place!

Alexander Pierce

Alexander Pierce Captain America Winter Soldier

In the same above scene, Alexander Pierce (Robert Redford) confronts Cap as he makes to exit the Avengers building with the Space Stone. We saw Pierce’s character in “Captain America: Winter Soldier,” and now that Cap knows of his affiliation with Hydra, he’s not about to part with an Infinity Stone. Even though neither party gets the rock in the end (thanks, Loki), it was pretty awesome getting to see Pierce working behind the scenes. Now, we know how the Space and Mind Stones ended up in Hydra’s hands!

Peggy Carter

Peggy Carter

Not all encounters with people in the past are bad ones for Steve Rogers. Some of them hurt in a different way. The most heartbreaking confrontation was with Peggy Carter (Hayley Atwell), the woman he fell in love with back in the ’40s. While Tony Stark was talking with his father, the Russo brothers decided to hit with an emotional double-whammy. In a scene reminiscent of ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream,’ Rogers sees the love of his life through the window of her office. So close, yet so far.

Peggy and Captain America in First Avenger

While the mission came first at that point in time, seeing Peggy stoked the flames of his love for her. So much so that after Thanos was defeated and the Infinity Stones were returned, Steve Rogers decided to “try some of that life that Tony was always telling him to get.” He chooses to stay back in time with her. Peggy and Cap finally got their long-awaited dance and lived a happy married life together. Another plot thread we didn’t expect to see resolved.

Hank Pym

Hank Pym Ant-Man and the Wasp

When time travel via the Quantum Realm is involved, it only makes sense that Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) shows up at some point. While he doesn’t get to do much, we do get to see a digitally de-aged Hank in the ’70s as well as the current version we’re familiar with during the end funeral scene.

Happy

Happy Iron Man 2

This film featured a number of returning characters from the Iron Man trilogy including Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow). We were happy (pun intended) to see this also meant the return of Jon Favreau’s character as well. With Stark tragically dead at the end of the film, it looks like Happy is going to help Pepper raise little Morgan Stark.

Who else was there?

Jane Foster

While that’s the main returning cast, we’ll also give a shoutout to characters who briefly made appearances as well:

  • Nick Fury
  • Pepper Potts
  • Jane Foster
  • Jasper Sitwell
  • Crossbones
  • Janet Van Dyne
  • Human Jarvis
  • Harley Keener
  • Everyone killed in the snap

Did we get them all?

With the huge cast of characters in MCU, it is easy to miss one here or there. If we missed any, let us know in the comments below. Also, let us know who you were most psyched to see return to the big screen!

5 Marvel stories the MCU should use after ‘Avengers: Endgame’

With Endgame in our rearview mirror, it’s time to look ahead at other possible Marvel projects to come.

SPOILERS BELOW! 

Endgame Iron Man Helmet

Now that we got that out of the way…

The aftermath of “Avengers: Endgame” left many fans in tears, both of joy and of sadness. The film presented a satisfying and climactic end to a 22-movie saga that changed the landscape of blockbuster films forever. We don’t know where the MCU is going to go after Endgame, but we do have some theories:

For many fans, it’s difficult to imagine Marvel ever surpassing Endgame. While this may end up being true, there have been dozens of huge crossover events throughout Marvel’s decades of comic books. One major advantage the MCU has moving forward is Disney’s purchase of FOX. This gives the MCU access to lucrative Marvel characters like the X-Men, the Fantastic Four, and Deadpool. Here are five massive Marvel stories that could end up becoming major successes in the MCU:

5 Marvel stories the MCU should use after “Avengers: Endgame”

5. Secret Invasion

secret invasion mcu marvel skrulls

In the comics, the shapeshifting alien Skrulls have been a pain in the side of many superhero teams. This includes the Fantastic Four and the Avengers. The storyline “Secret Invasion” has several key figures in the Marvel Universe being kidnapped and secretly replaced with Skrulls. It leads up to a full-on invasion of Earth.

Earth’s heroes quickly find themselves unable to trust one another, worried that they may be talking to a Skrull. The Skrulls even took the form of several beloved dead Marvel heroes to sew confusion and emotional vulnerability among the Avengers. This is something that could be exploited in a movie adaptation to bring back some fan-favorite characters temporarily.

The invasion force has them combining the powers of several heroes into single beings called Super Skrulls. In this story, the Skrulls use their psychological and scientific prowess to bring the Avengers to their knees.

The Skrulls finally made their MCU appearance in “Captain Marvel,” being portrayed as sympathetic refugees hoping to escape the imperialistic, warlike Kree. While their portrayal in “Captain Marvel” worked in the movie and was a welcome surprise, there are several ways the MCU can turn the Skrulls into a vicious invasion force.

Since “Captain Marvel” took place in the ’90s, they could show a rebuilt Skrull Empire that has since shunned their peaceful ways. Alternatively, they could show a powerful Skrull terrorist force that goes rogue from the Skrulls we already saw. Either way, “Secret Invasion” would be a massive, body-snatching cinematic experience.

4. Annihilation

“Annihilation” was a comic storyline that had many of Marvel’s cosmic heroes like the Silver Surfer, (what would become) the Guardians of the Galaxy, and Nova defending the universe against the unstoppable Annihilation Wave. The Annihilation Wave was a force of millions of insect-like ships led by Annihlus. It was so powerful it managed to subdue both Thanos and Galactus. The storyline is often cited as one of Marvel’s best events ever.

Films like “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Thor: Ragnarok,” and “Captain Marvel” have expanded on the MCU’s cosmic side for years. They show a delightfully weird and colorful cast of characters and locations. After introducing some of FOX’s Marvel characters like the Silver Surfer, an MCU adaptation of “Annihilation” would be the grand climax the MCU cosmos deserves.

3. Avengers vs X-Men

avengers vs xmen movie mcu endgame

In many ways, FOX’s X-Men movie franchise can be seen as a precursor to the MCU. While it had its ups and downs, you can’t say that it wasn’t ambitious. Now that Disney owns FOX, the beloved cast of mutants can finally join the MCU. And what better way to introduce them to the Avengers than to have them fight?

The “Avengers vs X-Men” comic event is confusing, overstuffed, and underwhelming. However, this doesn’t mean that the basic concept wouldn’t translate well to the MCU. Pairing up Marvel’s most famous mutants like Wolverine, Storm, Cyclops, and Gambit against the Avengers would be many comic fans’ dream come true.

Since Marvel has had continued success in bringing together huge casts of characters, they should have no problem with this. It’s unfortunate we wouldn’t see iconic Avengers like Iron Man or Captain America suit up to fight the mutants. However, it would nonetheless be a treat for audiences to have two of Marvel’s greatest teams duke it out.

2. House of M

scarlet witch house of m mcu endgame

The Scarlet Witch of the comics is a very different beast than the one in the MCU. After experiences devastating losses, she uses her reality-warping powers to change the world. She creates one where everyone she cares about gets their heart’s desire.

In this new world, mutants dominate the world and humans are second class citizens. She rules alongside her adoptive father Magneto and her brother Quicksilver. They try to put an end to the constant human uprisings led by revolutionaries like Luke Cage. Some characters don’t want this world to end. Spider-Man, for example, is a beloved hero in this world who is happily married to the now alive Gwen Stacy.

In the MCU, Wanda has faced incredible loss after the events of “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” “Captian America: Civil War,” and “Avengers: Infinity War.” After Thanos brutally resurrects and then murders Vision after she was forced to kill him, Wanda was quickly snapped away by the mad titan.

When she comes back in the climactic battle of “Avengers: Endgame,” she shows a brand new ferocity in her fight against Thanos. She is nearly able to kill him singlehandedly by ripping him apart. This newly revived Wanda is clearly a broken person, which could easily lead her to do some questionable things. This may include rewriting reality. Scarlett Witch is set to appear in a new show for Disney+ called “WandaVision.” If the show follows “House of M,” we will not be disappointed.

1. Secret Wars

secret wars mcu avengers endgame

Note: This will be about Jonathan Hickman’s 2015 Secret Wars event and not the 1984 original miniseries.

The 2015 crossover event “Secret Wars” changed Marvel Comics forever. It brought an end and new beginning to the shared comic universe that had been running since the early 1960s. As the culmination of Jonathan Hickman‘s amazing Fantastic Four and Avengers runs, “Secret Wars” is arguably the greatest event Marvel has ever produced.

The series has Doctor Doom stealing the power of the omnipotent Beyonders, allowing him to bend reality to his will. Doom uses his new power to create Battleworld, a patchwork of various Marvel universes and timelines, all under his control. Different heroes and villains from across the Marvel Multiverse must band together and fight a hopeless battle against a god.

The Secret Wars storyline brought a rare sense of finality to comic books. While the Marvel Universe continued after “Secret Wars,” it would be one hell of a way to close out the MCU for good.

In conclusion

It’s still hard to believe that the Thanos saga has been concluded. We are happy with the conclusion, we just also want more. What stories would you like to see the MCU adapt moving forward? Let us know in the comments below!

Russo brothers announce Endgame is their last MCU film

It is the end of an era as Joe and Anthony Russo announce they are leaving the MCU for the foreseeable future.

Captain America Endgame

They gave it whatever it took.

Joe and Anthony Russo have announced that “Avengers: Endgame” will be their last MCU film for the foreseeable future.

The Russo brothers began started directing films in the MCU in 2014 with “Captain America: The Winter Soldier.” They have also directed “Captain America: Civil War” and “Avengers: Infinity War.”

“It’s our Endgame, at least for now,” said Anthony Russo in an interview with GamesRadar. “We don’t have any plans for now to make any more Marvel movies. It certainly may come up in the future at some point. We have a wonderful working relationship with [Marvel Studios] and a great passion for what they’re doing.”

The Russo brothers have other non-MCU projects on the horizon, according to IMDb.

The brothers have teamed up with Tom Holland who plays Spider-Man in the MCU for a new movie called “Cherry.” The movie is about an army medic who becomes a drug addict and a bank robber.

Although it is not part of the MCU, the Russo brothers recently announced a project about Marvel’s greatest hero, Stan Lee.

Stan Lee

“We are fascinated by the life of Stan Lee and we are actually developing a little something that has to do with his work in the history of Marvel,” said Anthony Russo in an interview with Cinemablend. “But we are not ready to present it or talk about it yet. It’s more of a documentary.”

Seeing the Russo brothers leave the MCU is upsetting. The movies they made for the MCU are some of the best it has to offer. “Avengers: Endgame” had the biggest opening weekend in film history.

We’re sad to see the Russo brothers go. Their love and commitment to the characters have been a joy to witness. We don’t know much about who may or may not be replacing them. Jon Watts will return as director for “Spider-Man: Far From Home,” and Scott Derrickson is set to direct the next Doctor Strange film. However, we don’t know who will direct the next MCU team-up film. Whoever it may be, they have big shoes to fill.