GameStop killer: Microsoft announces Xbox without a disk drive

Microsoft announces an Xbox that only plays digital games. What does this mean for the industry?

Xbox digitial editionThat storage bin in your parent’s basement filled with your old NES cartridges might need to make room for your Xbox discs.

Presumably in response to Sony’s PlayStation 5 announcement yesterday, Microsoft gave us details on a new Xbox One S. 

The new system will support digital content only. You read that correctly. The system does NOT have a disk drive. 

The system comes with digital versions of Minecraft, Forza Horizon 3, and Sea of Thieves. The system along with the three games costs $250. Since those three games together can run more than $100, this is a heck of a deal. 

What does this mean?

Does this mean that the next big Xbox console will be digital only? Well, maybe. This could all be a test to see if gamers are ready for the switch.

If this idea intrigues you, it might be time to start looking into the best games for the Xbox One.

Moving to digital only would be a big step. Brick-and-mortar stores like GameStop would suffer from the lack of games on the shelves.

Returning and refunding games would also be a bit trickier. Companies like Steam have a return policy for downloaded games.  However, selling old games for money to buy new games could very well be a thing of the past. We may no longer be able to sell a dozen $60 games for a total of eight bucks.

The Xbox One S All-Digital Edition is set to go on sale May 7.

TikTok banned in India

TikTok is banned in India for showing inappropriate content to minors, but are they alone?

Tik Tok

TikTok has been removed from the App Store and Google Play store in India today after a court ruling. TikTok is fighting the removal in court. You can still download it through Softonic’s catalog here:

9

In a statement to CNN Business, TikTok said, “We have faith in the Indian judicial system and we are optimistic about an outcome that would be well received by over 120 million monthly active users in India.”

TikTok has about half a billion downloads across the globe. Of those, about 25% of users are in India making this a massive hit for the company.

Why is TikTok being blocked in India?

TikTok has been blocked in India due to the fear that the app is helping to spread inappropriate content to children.

TikTok does list policies against inappropriate content such as porn, cyberbullying, and harassment. Those who violate TikTok’s policies can be reported and banned from the service. This is the protocol for most apps.

The app description suggests it is for ages 12+, but the purpose of the app is not to share material for an 18+ audience. The main purpose of TikTok is to share original videos, typically with musical flair like this:

Does TikTok have inappropriate content?

As we all know according to Rule #34 of the internet, “If it exists, there is a porn version of it.” TikTok is no exception.

Users have been using the app to make pornographic content. Finding pornographic material through the app is not difficult. Then again, finding porn on the internet isn’t hard.

Sure, you can use the app to shoot and share inappropriate content, but you can do that with a slew of other apps as well. 

You can potentially cyberbully people on any social media platform as well. TikTok is not the only offender, so they shouldn’t be singled out for this.

What does this mean for TikTok?

We’re guessing that this ban will only be temporary. This happened before in Indonesia for the same reason, but it was overturned.

The 18+ crowd in India that loves to use TikTok will voice their stance on the issue. Most likely, the app will return to making more videos like these:

Where do we go from here?

The inappropriate content is far from the only reason why you might want to consider removing TikTok. In February, the app had to pay nearly $6 million in fines for stealing information from its 13-and-under users. 

TikTok might be unintentionally exposing kids to inappropriate content. However, it is intentionally stealing their data. 

Banning one app won’t keep children safe. If you don’t want your children looking at inappropriate content, TikTok is far from the only app you need to worry about. Parental vigilance and child education are your best bets to keeping your family safe.

Here’s what we know about the PlayStation 5

Sony releases info for the PlayStation 5 and it screams “next-gen.”

PlayStation 4

Oh PS4, how we have loved you. From scaling cliffsides with Nathan Drake to shooting zombies in The Last of Us, you’ve been a gem. However, it is time for the next generation.

Sony recently released a few new details of the PlayStation 4’s successor in an interview with Wired. Although it hasn’t officially been called “PlayStation 5,” we highly doubt Sony would break a winning formula.

As you can see below, PlayStation hasn’t told us a lot. However, what we do know is interesting. 

PlayStation 5

Backwards compatible

Don’t worry, you will bring your library of PS4 games with you to the new PlayStation 5.

8K vs 4K

If you have a 4K or 8K television, it means the TV has sharp image quality, with a horizontal screen resolution of around 4,000 pixels.

You probably don’t have an 8K television. Right now, 4K is the norm. However, 8K is available and it’s becoming more popular.

Having 8K resolution support means that Sony expects the PlayStation 5 to have a long life. For years after you buy your console, you will still be gaming with the industry standard.

SSD vs. HDD

This one is a bit complicated, but trust us, it’s awesome.

The hard disk drive storage system of the PlayStation 4 is being upgraded to a solid state drive for the PlayStation 5.

If something has a hard disk drive, there are moving parts to it that read and write storage information. A solid state drive doesn’t have any moving parts, as all data is stored on microchips. This makes SSD faster and better than HDD. How is it better? Let’s lay it out with this info from GamingScan:

  • SSDs have virtually no access time.
  • SSDs are 15 times faster in i/o performance.
  • SSDs are about 10 times less likely to fail.
  • SSDs save more energy and use less energy from the CPU.
  • Request times are about 20 times faster.
  • Backups are four times quicker.

Ray-tracing

The new system’s graphics processing unit (GPU) will support a technology called ray-tracing. Ray-tracing is a visual technique that models how light and shadows will behave in a 3D environment. Typically, you see ray-tracing in Hollywood blockbusters. It does exist to some degree in PC gaming, but not on any current home-console.

The functionality of ray-tracing is up for debate. Many current users don’t like it because it sacrifices FPS for only marginally better graphics.

PlayStation 5 needs to enable ray-tracing technology without compromising FPS. If they can, then both Microsoft and Nintendo will have their work cut out for them.

Sooooo… it’s gonna be awesome?

We don’t have a lot of details, but so far everything looks promising. We highly doubt Sony will reveal a major hindrance to the system that will ruin it. However, this is the same company that thought Knack was an appropriate launch title. Stay tuned and we’ll share more details as they become available.

Leaked docs: Zuckerberg leveraged Facebook user data

A new leak shows that Facebook cherry-picked partners, advertisers for who got our personal data.

Mark Zuckerberg

News about Facebook selling our personal data is nothing new. However, this time we got a little more insight about the backdoor dealings with our data. 

Facebook Download now ►
7

Leaked documents show that Mark Zuckerberg, along with his board and management team, used Facebook user data as a bargaining chip with its business partners.

The documents were shared with NBC News, Computer Weekly, and Germany’s Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.

Private information included info about your friends, photos, and relationship data. 

In one case, Facebook gave Amazon extensive user data information. This was because Amazon was spending money on Facebook advertising, according to an article from NBC. 

Is this anything new?

Companies share data about you with other companies. That’s nothing new. The issue is that there isn’t another company like Facebook that knows this much about you or one that has the ability to profit from your data this much. 

These leaked documents showed that Facebook was monetizing user data through third-party methods. These methods include direct payment, advertising spending, and data-sharing arrangements.

The data wasn’t sold to just anyone. According to the documents, the company instead dished it out to app developers considered to be “friends” of Zuckerberg, or Facebook advertisers.

Facebook has a lot of data on you. Even if you permanently delete your profile, some information will remain on Facebook for up to 90 days after you delete your account. Even then, some traces of your Facebook presence will still be detectable, according to the Facebook Help Center.

Why is this dangerous?

Last year, you might have heard of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. 

A political data firm hired by the Trump campaign took data from millions of Facebook users. This was done without their knowledge. Although Facebook suspended Cambridge Analytica from its platform, it insisted what the firm did was not a data breach. Furthermore, Facebook claimed that users opted to have their data taken.

Facebook took action against Cambridge Analytica after the deed was already done. Whether or not you’re a fan of Trump, the facts show that this Facebook deal helped his election. If our personal data can alter election outcomes, then selling it can be dangerous.

What should I do?

Deactivate your Facebook account

After the Cambridge Analytica scandal, users left Facebook in droves. After this scandal, we wouldn’t be surprised if those numbers grew.

Facebook needs to hold itself accountable. Unfortunately, as long as the company keeps making money, they may not change without government oversight.

HUD recently charged Facebook with discrimination. We are still waiting to see how that unfolds. Hopefully, this and the current scandal will inspire Facebook to make some changes. Until then, it might be time for us to join the millions of people who have already decided to leave Facebook. 

And if Facebook is selling your data, you might as well do it, too.

Does 3D printing pose a threat to security?

From stealing your bank information to the ability to crash airplanes, 3D printing has growing security concerns.

3D Printing

When most of us think about 3D printing, nothing malicious comes to mind. You probably think about someone 3D printing a small toy, or even a patient receiving a 3D printed hip. 

Although there are many benefits, the security risks from 3D printing range from compromising our privacy to threatening human lives.

Fooling your phone

Fingerprint scannerRecently, an Imgur user posted that he was able to fool the Samsung Galaxy S10 with a 3D printed finger.  If you only use fingerprint security, a hacker using this technology could 3D print your finger and access your information in less than 15 minutes. 

You might think that getting your fingerprint is difficult, but it is easier than you would think. The Imgur user darkshark was able to do so by photographing his fingerprint on a wine glass. From there, the process of printing the fingerprint took less than three minutes. 

Many people not only use fingerprint scans to protect their phones but also their bank accounts. Through 3D printing, having your fingerprint stolen can be just as damaging as having your credit card stolen.

Access to guns

3D printed guns

The truth about 3D printed guns is that they aren’t the best option. They’ve known to be unreliable, and often times fragile. If you want a gun that works, you’re better off a real one. However, that does not mean that 3D printed guns aren’t dangerous.

The biggest issue with 3D printed guns is their availability. If someone has access to the necessary materials, they can print as many guns as they want minus whatever background checks are necessary. Recently, a man in Dallas was arrested after he was found with a partially 3D-printed weapon and a hit list. Although he was caught before he carried out his mission, this should be a wake-up call for government leaders. 

Not even John Wick can commit a major act of terrorism with a 3D gun. However, availability and the ability to bypass regulations make them a big problem. 

Life-threatening design flaws

Plane crashA 2016 report from a Johns Hopkins University research team showed how hackers can put in an intentional design flaw into a drone.

The team “hacked” into the schematics for a drone, and put a few design flaws into the propeller. The flaws were naked to the human eye but were so damaging that it caused the drone to crash after less than two minutes of flying.

The report raised the question, “If this happened to a drone, could it happen to something bigger?” 

“With digital becoming physical, you could implant weaknesses into airplanes, into military tanks, into buildings. You could target people by implanting some kind of flaw that causes their personal devices to critically malfunction,” said Troy Smith, an associate economist for the RAND Corporation.

What should we do about it?

The positive impacts of 3D printing far outweigh the negative. For example, doctors are now able to 3D print blood vessels and some organs for human use.

This whole issue comes down to both cybersecurity and regulation. 

Despite being a flimsy copy, a 3D printed gun is still a gun and is still capable of killing people. Although the common man might not be able to hack into Boeing and screw up the design of a plane, there are hackers with these capabilities. 

We need to take keeping 3D printable gun blueprints out of criminals’ hands as seriously as we do with over-the-counter guns. We also need to upgrade our cybersecurity. 

When it comes to 3D printable fingerprints, it’s worth the extra 15 seconds to create a password for added security.

Twitter reduces daily follow limit to fight spam

The policy change hopes to cut down on Twitter spammers.

Twitter feed

Twitter has reduced the daily amount of accounts you can follow per day from 1,000 to 400. The company is not trying to hinder your ability to follow every K-pop band; they are trying to prevent spammers. 

You might have noticed one of your favorite celebrities or meme accounts beginning to follow you. In a flurry of excitement, you immediately follow them back. However, after some time has passed, your new follower unfollowed you.

Basically, what happened was the account followed as many others as it could, so that users would instinctively follow them back. After amassing an army of followers, the accounts will then unfollow you.

Twitter Head of site integrity Yoel Roth gave the reasoning as to why the company settled on 400 follows.

“In short, we found that 400 is a reasonable limit that allows people to follow the accounts they’re interested in each day while stopping the most spam,” Roth said.

“(A total of) 99.87% of Twitter users are totally unaffected by this lower rate limit. Most people don’t need or want to follow that many accounts. But some legitimate accounts, like businesses providing customer service by DM, actually do need it, and we want to avoid burdening them,” Roth continued.

Twitter announced last year that the company was doing more to combat spam. In May of 2018, the company had targeted and challenged about 10 million accounts suspected of spamming users.

The company also began the following practices to reduce spam:

  • Reducing the visibility of suspicious accounts in Tweet and account metrics
  • Improving the sign-up process
  • Auditing existing accounts for signs of automated sign-up
  • Expansion of malicious behavior detection systems

If you are looking to better protect your own security on Twitter, you can now sign in using a security key.

At the end of the day, none of us NEEDS to follow 1,000 accounts. Many of us probably don’t even have 400 counts already. If Twitter can reduce the amount of spam that currently clutters our feed, we don’t care what it costs.

Amazon employees use Alexa to listen to you

Security threat or innocent feature?

As the days go by, Alexa is turning more and more into HAL 9000.

A recent article from Bloomberg shows that thousands of Amazon employees listen to you through your Alexa.

Employees track data from conversations to help Alexa better understand human speech. That helps Alexa respond quickly and efficiently.

However, Amazon employees also like to share recordings of interesting conversations they overhear. That private conversation you had with your significant other might not have been as private as you thought.

Amazon Alexa

If this freaks you out, it might be time to switch to Google Home.

In one instance, employees overheard what they believed was a sexual assault. When they reported the matter to their supervisors, they were told it wasn’t Amazon’s job to interfere. (Prime Directive much?)

“We have strict technical and operational safeguards and have a zero tolerance policy for the abuse of our system,” Amazon wrote in an email to Bloomberg. “Employees do not have direct access to information that can identify the person or account as part of this workflow. All information is treated with high confidentiality and we use multi-factor authentication to restrict access, service encryption and audits of our control environment to protect it.”

The FAQ section for the Amazon Alexa has a few more answers. When asked if Alexa is recording all of our conversations, Amazon responds with a resounding, “No.” Later in the section, it also reiterates the email to Bloomberg saying that it uses some recordings to help further human speech understand.

Sadly, technology spying on us is nothing new.

Our laptops, smartphones, and even some of our apps have all served as microphones and cameras for prying eyes and ears.

The best thing that we can do is to research these products before putting them into our home. If a company blindsides us, we need to remove the product and voice our outrage.

If Alexa is only using our conversation data to improve, that’s one thing. However, Amazon needs to conduct an internal investigation to determine whether or not employees are recording private conversations for their own amusement.

Alexa is not the first device to listen in on us, and it won’t be the last. The device still has many great features you can try. However, next time you are having a private conversation, remember that someone else might be listening.

Opera browser adds crypto-wallet

Opera releases Reborn 3 browser with support for cryptocurrencies and ad blocking.

The fight to be the most complete and fastest browser has raged for some time, and the battle just heated up with the arrival of Opera Reborn 3. Reborn 3 brings new options and a new design. It includes a dark theme for both mobile and desktop use. It also has complete customization to control privacy and security when surfing the web.

But this upgrade not only affects design and usability, but it also incorporates options such as a free VPN.

Opera Reborn 3 wants to be the browser of the future. It incorporates a security blockchain technology that is used to make payments. Fans of these electronic currencies are in luck since the new version of Opera allows us to operate with them with total security.

Reborn 3 also brings an ad blocker to the table. That’s not all, it also brings features like a currency converter, desktop-mobile compatibility, a screen grabber, and messages in the sidebar.

Of course, the interface has also been modified so you can customize the browser to your liking. Without question, Opera Reborn 3 is going to give the rest of the browsers on the market a run for their money.

Everything we know about Disney+

Disney hopes to leave Netflix in the dust with new streaming service.

C’est la vie, Netflix.

Yesterday at Disney’s Investor Day, the company revealed its new streaming service Disney+ set to come out on Nov. 12. The company also announced a massive library of movies and shows.

Streaming Wars Episode I: The Phantom Service

Quite possibly the most shocking part of the reveal was the price. Disney+ will cost $6.99 per month, nearly half of Netflix’s $12.99 per month price.

The first signs of the upcoming Disney-Netflix duel came when Netflix canceled several popular Marvel shows in anticipation of the Disney+ launch. Although most of Netflix streams come from older shows like “The Office,”  shows like “Daredevil” were very popular with fans. The fact that Netflix might have trouble renewing the rights to those properties probably had a hand in their demise.

We have yet to see if our favorite Defenders like Daredevil or Jessica Jones will make their way to Disney+. For now, Netflix’s list of original series feels hollow without them.

As the service hasn’t launched, we cannot definitively say which service is better. However, if you do cancel your Netflix subscription, make sure to tell your friends and family who use your account.

Projects coming to Disney+

Falcon & Winter SoldierAt launch, Disney+ will include:

  • 7,500 episodes of current and off-air TV shows
  • 25 original series
  • 10 original movies and specials
  • 400 library movie titles
  • 100 recent theatrical films

As Disney recently acquired 21st Century Fox, Disney+ will include all 30 seasons of “The Simpsons.” 

The following are new projects coming to Disney+:

Live Action Series:

  • “High School Musical: The Musical: The Series”
  • “The Mandalorian”
  • “Diary of a Female President”
  • “The Falcon and the Winter Solider”
  • “Loki”
  • Untitled Cassian Andor Series
  • “WandaVision”

There also might be a live-action Hawkeye show. Jeremy Renner was on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” and played it cool when asked if the show was going to happen.

Animated Series & Shorts:

  • “Forky Asks a Question”
  • “SparkShorts”
  • “Lamp Life”
  • “Monsters at Work”
  • “Star Wars: The Clone Wars”
  • “Marvel’s What If…?”

Documentaries, Unscripted Series & Live Specials:

  • “Encore!”
  • Untitled Walt Disney Imagineering Documentary Series
  • Marvel’s Hero Project
  • “The World According to Jeff Goldblum”
  • “Be Our Chef”
  • “Cinema Relics: Iconic Art of the Movies”
  • “Into the Unknown: Making Frozen 2”
  • “Magic of Animal Kingdom”
  • “Marvel’s 616”
  • “(Re)Connect”
  • “Rogue Trip”
  • “Shop Class”
  • “Earthkeepers”
  • “Ink & Paint”

Original Films

  • “Lady & The Tramp” (Live-action)
  • “Noelle”
  • “The Phineas and Ferb Movie”
  • “Stargirl”

Disney+ projects

Hulu and ESPN+ package deal

Disney Chairman Kevin Mayer announced also announced a possible bundle deal. Hulu and ESPN+ will most likely be offered in a package with Disney+.

Hulu Plus Download Free ►
7

Disney acquired the majority share of Hulu in the 21st Century Fox purchase. Disney has owned the majority share of ESPN since 1996.

Bon Voyage, Bob Iger

Also at Investor Day, Disney CEO Bob Iger announced that he will be retiring in 2021. Iger became CEO in 2005 following Michael Eisner‘s retirement. No plans have been released yet as to when Disney will begin searching for its new CEO.

Iger has plenty of faith in the streaming service.

It’s gonna be awesome

Watching all of our favorite animated Disney movies for seven bucks sounds awesome. Watching all of that along with everything else under the Disney umbrella for seven bucks sounds incredible.

We can only hope that our favorite blind superhero will make his way back ot our screens, but either way you can bet on us downloading this on day one. 

Net neutrality voted to return (maybe)

The net is saved! Or is it…?

Fans of a free internet, rejoice! The FCC has voted to restore net neutrality.

Net neutrality has been a bit of a controversial subject throughout the years. To better understand net neutrality, the Wall Street Journal made a short video:

The vote does not mean that net neutrality has been restored just yet. The bill still has to go through the Republican-controlled Senate, and President Trump himself. 

The response

Trump took to Twitter in 2014, bashing net neutrality and comparing it to the Fairness Doctrine from the 1940s. 

FCC chairman Ajit Pai has been a long-time advocate for removing net neutrality. After the vote was made, Pai released a statement on Twitter.

You may remember Pai released this video to try to convince Americans that ending net neutrality would be a good thing. It did not go well.

The lawsuit

After the FCC voted to remove net neutrality, more than 20 states petitioned the FCC.

Ultimately, about two-dozen attorneys general sued the FCC, calling the decision “illegal.”

According to the lawsuit,  removing net neutrality violates the Administrative Procedure Act. The FCC cannot make “arbitrary and capricious” changes to existing policies such as net neutrality.  It disregarded evidence on industry practices and possible harm to consumers and businesses.

“The repeal of net neutrality would turn internet service providers into gatekeepers – allowing them to put profits over consumers while controlling what we see, what we do, and what we say online,” Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said. “This would be a disaster for New York consumers and businesses, and for everyone who cares about a free and open internet. That’s why I’m proud to lead this broad coalition of 22 Attorneys General in filing suit to stop the FCC’s illegal rollback of net neutrality.”

At the start of February, the FCC finally responded to the lawsuit in a statement from FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks.

“Today in federal court, this FCC is attempting to explain why it ignored the evidence before it and hastily abandoned the carefully crafted, common sense Open Internet framework established in 2015. In the process, it ignored the will of millions of people who made their support for a free and open internet crystal clear. Like many others, I am paying close attention,” Starks said

Starks continued, “We know that consumers cannot count on the good will of big business to protect their interests. Unfettered access to the open internet provides a gateway to opportunity. Strong, enforceable rules empower consumers to make sure they get the service that they pay for and expect. I strongly believe that the FCC made the right call with the framework it established in 2015, and I am hopeful that these critical consumer protections will soon be restored.”

What can we expect to happen?

If you are wondering how what fate may befall this bill from the FCC, this video from the 1970s may enlighten you.

Stranger things have happened during the Trump administration, so net neutrality may very well return. About 90% of Americans are in favor of a free internet provided by net neutrality. That said, senators and the president could pass the bill to gain support come election time. 

If net neutrality is restored, fans of a free internet everywhere will rejoice. Until that day comes, we won’t hold our breath.