Your iPhone is probably packed with thousands of trackers sending private data

A report shows that trackers guzzled 1.5 gigabytes worth of data over a month.

Phone data

The Washington Post tested an ordinary iPhone and found it had more than 5,400 trackers that were sending private data without the owner’s awareness.

This data included email addresses, phone numbers, and location data. 

In the story, the writer, Geoffrey Palmer, conducts an experiment to see how much data his iPhone is sending while he sleeps. It turns out that even though he isn’t actively using his phone, apps are sending data to entities like marketing companies and research firms in the background.

Over the course of a month, these trackers would have guzzled 1.5 gigabytes of data. 

How serious is this problem?

Believe it or not, a lot of apps do have legitimate reasons for sending your data. For example, GrubHub needs to know where you are if you want food delivered.

According to an article from 9to5Mac, many credit card and banking apps regularly use data to send signals to help detect fraudulent activity. In cases like these, you absolutely need these apps to send data.

Finally, many free apps are only free because of ads. In order to show you these ads, these apps need to send and receive data. If there are no ads, there are no free apps.

Alternatively, there are instances where apps are problematically sending your data.

Although there are legitimate reasons as to why an app would send personal information, Palmer did raise a good point.

“The problem is, the more places personal data flies, the harder it becomes to hold companies accountable for bad behavior — including inevitable breaches,” Palmer wrote.

What can Apple do to help?

App permission

If you’ve ever downloaded a new app on your iPhone, you’ve probably seen the message asking for your permission to allow the app to access your data.

This is routine for apps you download on iPhone as Apple wants/needs to be transparent. However, the transparency stops here as it often doesn’t tell you what the app is doing in the background. 

Most apps don’t tell you what companies are collecting your data and how they are keeping it safe. This opens the door for concern as you have no idea whether or not the data that has already been collected is safe.

Palmer suggests that Apple should be more accountable about what apps are doing with your personal data.

“Apple could require apps to label when they’re using third-party trackers,” Palmer wrote. “If I opened the DoorDash app and saw nine tracker notices, it might make me think twice about using it.”

DoorDash Download now ►
7

Should I be worried?

If you’re concerned about what apps are doing in the background, we would recommend downloading Datally. Unfortunately, that’s only available for Android phones.

9

Through Datally, you can disable apps that run in the background, and you can whitelist apps that you want to have unrestricted access.

As to whether or not you should be worried about your phone sending data, the answer is kinda. 

Apps send data in the background all the time. Heck, it seems like we write a story about Facebook acting irresponsibly with personal data once a week. Oh look, there’s another one!

There are plenty of reasons why you should throw your phone out the window and go off the grid altogether. However, if you pay close attention to what you are downloading and the permissions you give it, you can keep your data safe. Use common sense and best practices to protect your privacy, and you can keep yourself protected.

Is Microsoft about to ditch Windows?

Microsoft is aiming for “Seamless Updates” with its “modern OS.”

Recently, Microsoft began talking about a new high-tech OS system that possibly won’t be the next installment of Windows. 

Microsoft has been talking about the innovation that goes into developing the latest generation of Windows-enabled devices. At Computex in Taipei, Microsoft’s Corporate Vice-President of Consumer and Device Sales, Nick Parker, was quick to heap praise on some of Microsoft’s hardware partners for the new possibilities their devices are creating.

Microsoft execs in front of Windows PCs

Asus, Acer, and Dell were among the plaudits. Parker also spoke of a new “modern OS” that would make the most of the latest tech that was going into the newest machines. What Parker didn’t mention, however, was Windows. In fact, there was no mention at all about what this new modern OS would be called. It could be Windows 11, or it could be something else altogether.

Microsoft is aiming for ‘Seamless Updates’ with its ‘modern OS’

In many ways, Windows 10 has been a success story for Microsoft. After the abomination that was Windows 8, Windows 10 marked a true return to form for the software giant. It is now the most popular desktop operating system on the planet. As support for older versions of Windows falls away more and more people will turn to Microsoft’s flagship offering.

The success story hasn’t been without its problems. Windows 10’s update process is definitely the biggest Microsoft has faced with the new OS. Microsoft wants Windows 10 to be a continuously evolving OS and as such has been cramming new features, alongside security patches and bug fixes, into regular updates. Sometimes they interrupt regular use.  Updates are sometimes taking far too long,  or are too large. Also, they sometimes just straight-up not work and even delete user files. Clearly, these updates have been a constant thorn in Windows 10’s side.

Windows 10 updates
Windows 10 updates have long been a source of frustration for both Windows users and Microsoft execs

It is no surprise then that when talking about the future, Microsoft is aiming for what it calls seamless updates. In his talk in Taipei, Parker spoke of “Enablers” and “Delighters.” Enablers are the basics people expect from their devices and delighters provide more innovative experiences.

Parker went on to say, “Enablers include seamless updates – with modern OS updates invisibly done in the background; the update experience is deterministic, reliable, and instant with no interruptions!”

It almost sounds like he read that straight off of the Windows Help forums, where users have been spreading their ire about the Windows 10 update process.

The latest and greatest version of Microsoft's operating system.

Parker went on to talk about a lot of the other key features Microsoft believes a modern OS should have. This includes the likes of multiple input possibilities, constant connection, sustained performance, and security by default. Once again, there was no mention of Windows. Every time he spoke about the modern capabilities offered by the machines he lavished praise upon, he always spoke of a modern OS rather than Windows.

We can’t say for sure if Windows will be a relic of the past, but it is interesting. With Windows 10 continuously evolving, Parker could simply have been mapping out the direction that evolution will take in the future. He may not have been talking about a new operating system altogether.

The good news, however, is that if we can take one of Microsoft’s top VPs at his word. We know that Microsoft is working hard to fix the update problem that has been giving us all a communal headache for far too long.

While everyone’s hating on Sonic, let’s look back on the Super Mario Bros movie

Scared about Sonic? Let’s remember 1993’s Super Mario Bros movie.

After decades of disappointments, expectations for video game movies are mercifully low. Though dozens of video game movies have been made, the number of not just good, but decent video game movies can be counted on one hand. Games that seemingly would translate into excellent movies like Assassin’s Creed, Street Fighter, and Resident Evil were butchered into unrecognizable cash grabs that were seemingly terrified of their source material. To date, the single live-action video game movie that has a ‘Fresh’ score on Rotten Tomatoes is “Detective Pikachu.”

Will ‘Sonic’ be a blue, blurry disaster?

Even with expectations at an all-time low, general audiences could not possibly have been prepared for the live-action Sonic the Hedgehog trailer. If you’ve somehow missed it, here you go:

This trailer didn’t just set the internet on fire, it transformed it into a blazing hellscape. Sitting at 32 million views and nearly 700k dislikes, the trailer was brutally mocked by fans and nonfans alike. Sonic’s bizarre, not-quite-realistic-but-not-quite-cartoony redesign was by far the most common source of mockery. From his dirty-looking fur to his tiny spaced out eyes, to his unnerving uncanny valley proportions, Sonic’s “realistic” design became the subject of thousands of hilariously mean-spirited memes and tweets.

sonic movie design teeth
Whoever decided to give Sonic human teeth needs to be psychologically evaluated

The online uproar was so intense that Paramount actually delayed the movie from its original release date of November all the way to February in order to redesign the iconic character. Funnily enough, this seems to be the first time ever that a major movie studio has actually listened to the internet mob (think of all the petitions that rabid fans create to recast superheroes).

While it’s good that the filmmakers are redoing Sonic’s horrid design, the same probably can’t be said about the rest of the movie. Instead of featuring the whimsical loop-de-loops and checkered plains of the video games, the movie takes place in a lifeless realistic setting. Even worse, the movie borrows the same soulless “What if a cartoon entered OUR WORLD?” plot of live-action cartoon movies like “Alvin & the Chipmunks” and “The Smurfs,” a subgenre that hasn’t even been popular or successful in nearly a decade. They even used the tired “cartoon character and human meet and scream AAAAAAAAAAAHHH at each other” gag.

At the very least, the casting of Ben Schwartz as Sonic is actually an inspired choice, as his cocky attitude fits Sonic like the gloves he isn’t wearing. Most notably, Jim Carrey (cast as Sonic’s nemesis Dr. Robotnik/Eggman) seems to have left his recent pretentious antics behind to give a refreshingly 90s performance in this movie.

It’s sad that Sonic’s first leap to the big screen is such a lifeless monstrosity, as the franchise has already been the butt of jokes and scathing memes for years. However, history has shown us that even beloved video game franchises are not immune to bizarre live-action movies, including the most cherished video game series of all time: Super Mario Bros.

A look back at 1993’s Super Mario Bros movie

super mario bros movie

We’ve seen this movie dozens of times we still can’t quite believe that it exists. Seriously, just watch the trailer and try to make sense of what’s happening.

Yes, you just saw Bob Hoskins team up with John Leguizamo to fight Dennis Hopper’s King Koopa. The craziest part is that when this movie came out in 1993, there were no audience expectations of what a video game movie should be. At the time, the thought of adapting something as low brow as a video game into a movie was considered preposterous. After the movie’s release, critics, filmmakers, and general audiences were left scratching their heads, having gained no new insight into the future of video game movies. For those who haven’t seen the movie, allow us to (attempt) to explain the film.

At the beginning of the movie, a short animation plays that explains how the meteorite that killed the dinosaurs actually created an alternate dimension called Dinohattan where people evolved from dinosaurs rather than apes. The plumbing brothers Mario Mario (Bob Hoskins) and Luigi Mario (John Leguizamo) travel to Dinohattan as they try to rescue Luigi’s love interest Daisy (Samantha Mathis). Daisy has been kidnapped by King Koopa (Dennis Hopper) because she has the last shard of the meteorite, which Koopa needs in order to merge the dimensions under his iron fist.

If that sounds confusing, that’s because it is. The plot only resembles the paper-thin story of the games if you squint really hard and look from every angle. But you need to keep in mind that there was no groundwork as to what a video game movie should be, much less for a live-action adaptation of a story that’s literally just “rescue the princess.”

The filmmakers deserve some credit for taking a mainstream family-friendly property like Mario and trying to make something unique, surreal, and dark. Unfortunately, the film can’t hit the mark as a dark comedy due to panicked executives lightening the tone of the film and making it more family-friendly. This clash is most apparent when you consider the contrast between the dystopian set design and the script.

super mario bros movie set

At the time of the movie’s release, gritty urban reimaginings of beloved franchises were extremely popular, including 1989’s “Batman” and 1990’s “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.”

Acclaimed production designer David Snyder (who helped invent cyberpunk by designing the sets of “Blade Runner”) designed Dinohattan to be a primal, aggressive, and oppressive satire of modern urban life. Snyder enjoyed the opportunity to design the hellish city at multiple levels, as he was limited to the street level while working on “Blade Runner.” He referred the bloodthirsty reptilian art style as “New Brutalism,” reasoning that since the residents of Dinohattan evolved from dinosaurs, they would be significantly more primordial and savage than human beings, with their architecture and city design reflecting their aggressiveness. Speaking on the setting of “Super Mario Bros,” Snyder said: “We’ve designed this film with the idea of looking at New York while on some mind-altering drugs.”

Before shooting began, worried studio executives demanded the film’s script be rewritten to be more childlike. Unfortunately, the dinopunk sets were already built, which, as impressive as the set design is, leads to a jarring clash of tone between script and visuals in the final film.

Even with its weird tonal inconsistencies, Super Mario Bros is not an awful film, despite what Bob Hoskins thinks. It’s a bizarre and ineffective adaptation of a beloved property sure, but if they renamed the characters and called the movie “Dino Punks” or something, then the film could have been hailed as a cult classic today. The cast all put on charming performances and have chemistry with one another, the effects were outstanding at the time (and still hold up today, especially the animatronic Yoshi), and the surreal world of Dinohattan is something to behold.

What will the audience think?

This brings us to the million dollar question: will “Sonic the Hedgehog” overtake “Super Mario Bros” as the most infamous video game movie ever made? We think it’s possible, though both films attract a ton of negative attention for completely opposite reasons. “Sonic the Hedgehog” appears to be a movie that is incredibly safe, soulless, and stale, yet it completely disregards the source material. There is not a hint of artistry or passion for the property evident in the trailer; the film might as well have been made in a factory.

“Super Mario Bros,” on the other hand, is ambitious almost to a fault. While the film angered fans by not resembling the game at all, the crew bravely set out to create the next “Ghostbusters;” a dark, surreal comedy-adventure that was quite unlike anything audiences had ever seen. The clear amount of ambition and talent that went into “Super Mario Bros” has caused audiences to slowly warm to it in recent years. We can’t expect the same will happen for Sonic.

‘Rambo: Last Blood’ gets its first trailer

Rambo draws his bowstring one final time in the first trailer for ‘Rambo: Last Blood.’

Rambo trailerAt nearly 73-years-old, Sylvester Stallone  is showing no signs of retirement in this first trailer for “Rambo: Last Blood.” 

As the title suggests, this will be the last movie in the Rambo franchise.

The trailer looks like it takes place a few years after the events of 2008’s “Rambo.” At the end of that movie, Rambo returns home to the U.S. to reconnect with whatever family he has left.

At the beginning of this trailer, we see that Rambo is all alone, and is just trying to have as normal of a life as possible. However, after a group of bad guys force Rambo to relieve his checkered past, he must get back into action in order to get his revenge. 

Yes, that was the most cliché plot for an action movie ever.

This looks dumb, but also like dumb fun

Rambo bow

The Rambo franchise started off very seriously with “First Blood,” a film about a Vietnam veteran who comes home to find a country that has turned its back on him. However, the serious has gotten more and more silly with films that rely on over-the-top action.

WARNING: VIDEO IS NSFW

That said, over-the-top action can be a lot of fun, and this trailer hints that the movie might get that.

We’ll probably get to see Rambo blow up goons with his bow-and-arrow and lots of hack-and-slashing with his Bowie knife. Also, Rambo appears to have taken a lesson from Kevin McCallister from “Home Alone,” as he set a series of traps in his house to kill goons.

If Rambo’s traps are half as deadly as Kevin’s, these bad guys are in for a world of hurt.

We can’t help but talk about Stallone’s age. At 72, it really seems like he needs to leave action movies to the younger generation. If he does another “Rocky” movie, it will have to be about him fighting his nurse for his pain pills.

The trailer suggests that Rambo won’t be doing as much hand-to-hand combat as we have seen before. Hopefully, we will get traps and explosions like a “Saw” movie, and we won’t see Rambo try to emulate John Wick. 

Shut off your brain

Rambo machete

This movie probably isn’t going to give you a dramatic insight into the life of a veteran. If you want that, watch a movie like”Born on the Fourth of July” or “American Sniper.”

However, if you are looking for mindless action that will keep you entertained for about 90 minutes, this should keep you satisfied.

11 things you never knew about Jaws

Why did Spielberg sleep with celery under his pillow?

When “Jaws” hit theaters in 1975 it was a smash-success, often called the first true blockbuster. Two years later, George Lucas’ “Star Wars” defeated it in the box office (they shared a playful exchange on the subject), but Spielberg’s “Jaws” was the OG.

Despite the film’s huge success, the production was plagued with issue after issue, roadblock after roadblock. The shoot went on longer than expected, went so over-budget that Spielberg shelled out his own cash for re-shot scenes, the script was still being written during the filming, and even the mechanical shark retreated … by accidentally sinking to the bottom of the ocean.

If you haven’t seen “Jaws,” you can live stream it right here. Before you watch it, though, you may be amused to know these 11 crazy facts. Let’s dive in:

1. The author of the novel makes a cameo

“Jaws” was originally a novel penned by Peter Benchley. He was present on-set for much of the filming, and even got this cameo scene on the beach:

Benchley grew to hate the film, especially its climax, later calling it “an eat-’em-up ending that lacks only Queequeg’s coffin to resemble a bath tub version of Moby-Dick.”

2. The most famous line was ad-libbed

Jaws we're gonna need a bigger boat

When Brody is first surprised by the shark in this scene, he slinks back to Quint looking shell-shocked. He manages to croak out “we’re gonna need a bigger boat,” before the two head onto the deck. Roy Scheider actually improvised this line, but said it so quietly that it was drowned out by the screams of test audiences. Spielberg had to re-edit it to make the line more audible.

3. Spielberg thought the ‘Jaws’ music was a joke

Jaws opening
Spielberg later said “the score was clearly responsible for half of the success of that movie.”

Spielberg was very aware of John Williams’ talent before he asked him to write  for “Jaws.” Spielberg envisioned a score with otherworldy undertones and an eerie theme to match the context of an ominous underwater creature. When John Williams instead shared with him the two-note theme, Spielberg thought it was a joke.

4. ‘Finding Nemo’ wasn’t the first shark named ‘Bruce’

Jaws mechanical shark Bruce

Bruce Ramer is a pretty big entertaiment lawyer in Los Angeles, and Steven Spielberg was one his clients. As a joking tribute (and ominous foreshadowing of the many issues the rig would have), the crew nicknamed the shark rig “Bruce.”

Finding Nemo Bruce

In 2003 “Finding Nemo” paid tribute to this by naming the shark in their film “Bruce” as well.

5. The Orca did actually sink

Orca sinking Jaws
One camera was even submerged during the accident, but the film was salvaged!

While there were issues with practically every aspect of the ocean portion of the shoot, no one expected part of the plot to literally happen: Due to a malfunction one day, however, the Orca did start to actually sink. Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, and Richard Dreyfuss were all on-board at the time, sending Spielberg on a mad dash to bring boats out to rescue the actors and crew. When they arrived, Sound Engineer John R. Carter reportedly held his tape recorder over his head and shouted, “F**ck the actors, save the sound department!”

6. The shark ate George Lucas

Jaws rig
Maybe that’s where he found inspiration for this scene.

George Lucas was friends with Spielberg as well as “Jaws” screenwriter, John Milius. He came to visit during production, and especially enjoyed his time in the special effects shop … until he got his head stuck in Bruce’s mouth. What started as a prank ended up an actual emergency when the controls jammed, leaving Lucas stuck inside. They ended up having to pry the rig open in order to save him. Good thing too; he hadn’t even made “Star Wars” yet!

7. Spielberg slept with celery under his pillow for the whole shoot

Spielburg Jaws
Spielberg later called the film “my Vietnam. It was basically naive people against nature, and nature beat us every day.”

Spielberg was a perfectionist with his films, and that made the nerve-wracking experience of the “Jaws” shoot especially hard on the young director. Beset by mechanical problems with the shark, mounting pressure from the studio, and horrible weather conditions day after day, Spielberg suffered numerous mental breakdowns and sleepless nights. The cure? Celery. To help the poor man sleep at night, he had a familiar pillow sent from his California home, underneath which he kept a single stalk of celery. Apparently, the smell was comforting to him, and helped ease him to sleep.

8. That’s Spielberg’s dog

Jaws Spielburg dog Elma

Spielberg owned pets throughout his life, and had a particular fondness for dogs. During “Jaws,” his puppy Elma even got to make a cameo, sitting on Martin Brody’s couch.

9. That’s also him on clarinet

Spielburg clarinet Jaws

Early in the movie, there’s a scene on the beach where a high school band is playing a Sousa march. That’s John Williams’ orchestra as well, but many of them found it difficult to “play down” to a high school level. The solution? Put Spielberg on first clarinet. According to Williams, it “added just the right amateur quality to the piece.”

10. Fidel Castro loved it

Fidel Castro

“Jaws” was a huge commercial success, breaking box office records left and right. Of all people, Fidel Castro was a big fan of the story, and reportedly loved the book. The year the film came out he called the tale “a marvelous metaphor about the corruption of capitalism.”

11. This scene was shot in a pool

The above is definitely one of the more frightening scenes in the film; there’s something especially striking about the image of Ben Gardner’s head through the chewed up boat. While many scenes were shot in the actual Atlantic ocean, this one actually was not one of them. Instead, it was shot six months after principal photography was finished. Spielberg pored over the original scene, but eventually decided it needed a re-shoot. He borrowed some props and film equipment from the Univeral backlot and set up in the swimming pool of the movie’s editor, Verna Fields. He paid for the re-shoot out of his own pocket.

We hope you’ve enjoyed these 11 odd facts about “Jaws;” enjoy your next trip to the beach!

Skyrim’s best and most useful followers

When traveling throughout the world of Skyrim, it’s important to bring a companion. Here are the best!

Skyrim Lydia

Facing the trials of Tamriel can be difficult by yourself. Thankfully Bethesda has given you many companions to choose from in the massive game of Skyrim.

These followers come in all shapes and sizes, as there are dozens upon dozens that can help you complete the quests you face. Before starting your journey, you should take the time to find the follower you like the most. Here are some of the best followers you can find in The Elder Scrolls V:

8

Best followers in Skyrim

J’Zargo (vanilla)

 

J'Zargo

One of the only characters from the base game that has no level cap, J’Zargo is one of the easiest and strongest followers you can acquire. His quest becomes available after the first few quests of the College of Winterhold line.

Since his level is uncapped, his destruction magic can reach devastatingly strong levels in the late game. Also, he’s one of the only mages that will keep up with you past level 50. He also has pretty funny commentary on your actions as the game progresses.

Frea (Dragonborn DLC)

Frea

There are only a few followers in the game that are marked as “essential” and have an uncapped level limit. Since Frea is one of them, that means you can bring her for the most dangerous missions and never have to worry about her dying.

She can’t even be killed by you, the Dragonborn. Also, despite being a dual axe wielding tank-ish follower, she will actually use restoration magic when she gets low on health. This allows her to stay in the battle even longer.

Barbas (vanilla)

Barbas

This good boy brings a new definition to “man’s best friend.”

Barbas is a complicated case. He is technically only usable during his quest, but you can also take advantage of this to have multiple followers at once. Most of the time you can only have one humanoid and one animal companion at a time, but since he’s a quest follower, he will join you regardless.

He is also an essential companion that is incredibly powerful. He will never die and consistently do high damage. The downside to using him, however, is his constant barking if you aren’t following his quest. If you’re willing to put up with this though, he can make one of the best followers in the game.

Rieklings (Dragonborn DLC)

Riekling

The only “animal” followers that you can give equipment to, the Rieklings are a group of followers that you gain access to after completing their quest. While technically not essential, you basically have an unlimited supply of them, since you can just go back to their hut and get a new one.

We definitely recommend picking up one of these little guys, as they can help to effectively triple your inventory space along with a humanoid follower.

Serana (Dawnguard DLC)

Serana

From the moment you help this vampire out of her imprisonment, you are able to take advantage of this very powerful necromancer. She can basically give you two companions, as she will consistently reanimate your dead enemies, and provide a constant source of magic damage. Since she is also an essential unit, you never have to worry about her dying in battle.

On top of this, she has many unique interactions with the world as she is the only follower who is able to interact with all crafting areas. This is purely aesthetic, but it can be very fun to watch. If you have an older version of Skyrim, you’ll need the Dawnguard expansion to unlock her, as she is only obtainable from its main questline.

Dark brotherhood initiate (vanilla)

Dark Brotherhood

Along with J’Zargo, these two are the only followers from the base game without a level cap. However, unlike J’Zargo, they are marked as essential, meaning they will never die. If you don’t finish the quest they are associated with while you have them following you, it’s possible to get a second follower along with them.

This is a little exploitative, but even without this, they are a strong follower that anyone can benefit from using. They are also one of the few followers that are able to successfully sneak with the player.

Go on an adventure

If you’re playing Skyrim on the Nintendo Switch or a similar re-released version, you will already have all DLC installed. This means you won’t have to worry about whether you have the DLC to unlock some of these characters.

Hopefully, this list proved to you that there’s a world beyond Lydia.

Xbox Game Pass coming to Windows 10

Game Pass is coming to PC! But should I buy it?

Xbox Game Pass

Xbox is bringing its subscription service Game Pass to PC. Soon, PC gamers will have access to more than 100 games from developers like Bethesda, Deep Silver, Devolver Digital, Paradox Interactive, and Sega.

The service will only be available for Windows 10 users.

The latest and greatest version of Microsoft's operating system.

Microsoft typically charges $10 per month for Game Pass, but players can take advantage of a limited time offer and get it for $1 until June 10.

Later this year, Game Pass Ultimate will give players all the benefits of Xbox Gold as well as the vast library of games for $15 per month. That said, it might be in your best interest to wait until then so you can play with your friends online. 

The move appears to be an attempt by Microsoft to capitalize more on non-console gamers and boost Game Pass’s subscriber base.

What are the perks?

Aside from the library of games, the subscription comes with other sweet deals. You can get discounts of up to 20% for select games in the Microsoft Store. 

The PC-specific version of Game Pass will also have exclusive first-party games. Microsoft announced that they will reveal more details about the subscription service at E3 in June.

More games coming to Steam

Microsoft also announced today that they are bringing more games to Steam. These include Gears of War 5, and the definitive versions of Age of Empires I, II, and III. 

Should I buy a subscription?

If you want to know whether or not you should subscribe to Game Pass, you should look at the complete list of available games. Sure, there’s a bunch of solid games like Saints Row: The Third and Banjo Kazooie, but there are also some stinkers like  Metal Gear: Survive that will be included.

Where Game Pass on PC comes in handy is in that you won’t need to buy an expensive Xbox One in order to play these games.

Potentially, this service could convince you to leave consoles in the dust altogether. However, for those of us who already have the best games the service offers, it’s a pretty hard pass.

Watch: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare reveal trailer

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare says goodbye to annual passes, and hello to free content!

Modern Warfare explosion

After eight years of waiting, gamers are finally getting the next Modern Warfare game in the Call of Duty lineup. Activision released the trailer for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, and the hype is real:

To make things even better, we don’t have to wait very long before this comes out. The trailer ends by giving us a release date of Oct. 25 of this year!

New features

Modern Warfare night vision

According to Kotaku, the game will feature the following updates:

  • Modern Warfare will remove annual passes. Instead, it will deliver free maps, content, and post-launch events to all players. Although these features will be free, we don’t know whether or not Activision will include any paid content.
  • The game will feature cross-play support between PC and consoles. We don’t know if Xbox One users can play against PS4 players, but they will be able to play against PC users.
  • The PC version is exclusive to Battle.net
  • Modern Warfare will be on a completely new engine.
  • In the campaign mode, players will traverse through European cities as well as the Middle East.
  • You will be able to play co-op in “Elite Operations.”
  • There will be an “immersive narrative experience” crossing single-player, co-op, and competitive multiplayer.
Call of Duty Download now ►
7

What did the trailer show?

Captain Price

If you’re looking for next-level storytelling, Call of Duty simply isn’t the franchise for you. As far as stories go, there really isn’t a single Call of Duty game with a noteworthy story, and this game doesn’t look like it will be an exception. That said, we do get a shot of the return of fan-favorite character Captain Price. 

Although the story looks lacking, the graphics look absolutely top notch. 

Modern Warfare shoot shootCharacters move throughout the world without the landscape blurring around them. This suggests that the game has low motion blur. Over the past few years, motion blur has made its way into games. Basically, motion blur keeps characters looking crisp when the camera moves while the backgrounds get blurry. The Uncharted series is a prime example of a franchise with big motion blur issues.

Luckily, everything in this game looks crisp no matter how intense things get.

How will this be different from other Call of Duty games?

To be perfectly blunt, Call of Duty games don’t often stray from their winning formula. Call of Duty games consistently sell millions of copies despite the fact that each game feels like more of the same.

However, Activision appears to be atoning for sins of the past, and for that we’re excited. Not having to pay extra for more maps, content, and events is a huge step in the right direction. 

Do we think this game is going to be a contender for Game of the Year? Probably not. Death Stranding looks like it will have that on lockdown. However, it does look like it will set a positive tone for Call of Duty games in the future.

10 best superhero casting choices

From classic Superman films to the groundbreaking MCU, these performances paved the way for the franchise!

Thor

The choice of who you cast in your superhero flick can have huge consequences, both positive and negative.

When Disney cast Brie Larson for “Captain Marvel,” fans who disliked the actress review-bombed the movie on Rotten Tomatoes until it had an artificially low percentage. This was a factor that led to Rotten Tomatoes changing its review system entirely. 

Clearly, casting decisions can have a huge impact. That said, which choices were the best? Which actors transcended the screen, and truly became their characters?

Let’s find out!

10 best movie superhero casting choices

10. Ian McKellen as Magneto

Magneto

As far as comic book villains go, you’d be hard pressed to find a better-written villain than Magneto.

The Nazis put him in a concentration camp after killing his family for being Jewish. After this, Magneto realizes that he must fight back against those who challenge his very existence. Lo and behold, Magneto is a mutant, and there are also people who want him dead because of that.

Ian McKellen captures both his tragedy and motivations perfectly. Also, when showing off his abilities, he does so with such a quiet power. You just have this feeling that he could wipe out an entire building with a flick of his wrist.

McKellen’s final scene as Magneto happens toward the end of “X-Men: Days of Future Past.” In the scene, the last hope for the mutant race is about to be extinguished. Before recent events, Magneto fought against the X-Men as he believed that a future war was coming. Professor X didn’t deny this, but he believed in pursuing peace.

It turns out, both of them were right. However, Magneto realizes that it was his fault that mutants couldn’t come together to find peace with humans.

Magneto X CharlesMcKellan makes the character both powerful and tragic. That’s all we could have asked for our favorite master of magnetism. 

9. Michael B. Jordan as Killmonger

KillmongerWhen it comes to the MCU, villains typically aren’t considered the strong point of the films. Sure, actors like Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Hemsworth can really carry the film as the main hero, but their villains just pale in comparison. Can you even give the names of the villains in all three Iron Man movies?

Michael B. Jordan’s performance as Killmonger in “Black Panther” was what really broke the mold for a lot of fans. He commands the screen in all of his scenes.

Let’s look at the scene where he reveals to the king’s counsel that he is Wakandan, and he is challenging the throne:

He approaches the situation calmly at first by allowing himself to be taken in as a prisoner. He lets T’Challa make the first move to help dictate how the situation will unfold. However, once he is asked who he is, he reveals that he is Wakandan, by speaking it in isiXhosa, an actual language spoken in Africa.

Once everyone believes him, all the balls are in his court. T’Challa has to accept his challenge in order to abide by traditions. He also compromised T’Challa’s leadership by stating that T’Challa’s father, King T’Chaka, killed Killmonger’s father.

To be fair, one of the things that makes Jordan’s performance so poignant is the phenomenal writing. This line perfect:

Jordan commanded the screen as Killmonger so well, that we actually kinda wish he would’ve ended up on Wakanda’s throne.

8. Josh Brolin as Thanos

ThanosWow, three villains in a row!

Josh Brolin did not have an easy task ahead of him when he agreed to play the mad Titan Thanos. He had to somehow capture all the hype leading up to a character we had been waiting to see for more than five years.

He not only nailed it, but “movie Thanos” was better than “comic book Thanos.”

Yeah, yeah, yeah. that was a pretty bold statement, but let’s take a look at the comics. There, Thanos wanted to gather the Infinity Stones so that he could woo the female embodiment of death.

Seriously, we’re not kidding.

thanos and deathSure, Thanos’s motivations in “Avengers: Infinity War” are not pure, but they are stronger than what we were given in the comics.

Brolin was menacing, well-written, and well-performed. There were so many movies leading up to his arrival, and yet Brolin was able to make the wait worthwhile. And he’s a completely digital creation!

Hopefully, Marvel will showcase a great new villain in the MCU now that he’s gone. If not, fans will be at the theaters shouting, “Bring us Thanos!”

7. Michael Keaton as Batman

Batman

In major Hollywood Batman films, we’ve had Adam West, Christian Bale, Val Kilmer, George Clooney, Ben Affleck, and, of course, Michael Keaton don the cape and cowl. With so many different Batman (Batmans? Batmen?) to choose from, what makes Keaton come out as the best?

The answer is simple, Keaton was able to be a good Bruce Wayne AND a good Batman.

Sure, other actors who have played the bat have done well. Christian Bale was a menacing Batman, but he was a forgettable Bruce Wayne. Also, don’t even get us started on his voice:

Adam West is the OG Batman for a lot of people, but he lacked the dark and ominous feel the character is known for having.

Ben Affleck was one of the only interesting parts of “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” and “Justice League.” However, flat dialogue and meandering storylines gave the bat nothing to work with.

Keaton’s performances in  “Batman” and “Batman Returns” were coupled with great writing from Tim Burton. Pair Keaton’s performance with other great villains like Joker and Penguin, and you have something special.

6. Patrick Stewart as Professor X

Charles Xavier

Patrick Stewart had a difficult task ahead of him when he chose to play Professor Charles Xavier. He had to take the character from humble beginnings as a teacher and leader of the X-Men, to a freedom fighter trying to save the mutant race, to a frail old man seeking redemption.

Despite the varying quality of the X-Men movies, Patrick Stewart was consistently one of the best parts. Each word out of his mouth is filled with hints of both his experience and his pain.

In “Logan,” Xavier is battling dementia and is in recovery after he caused the death of nearly every one of the X-Men.  After discovering a child with mutant powers that needs his help, Xavier begins a journey toward redemption.

The story gives a tragic, yet fitting conclusion to Xavier’s journey. That journey would have felt far less fulfilling if not for the work of Patrick Stewart.

5. Christopher Reeve as Superman

Christopher Reeve

Superman is not an easy character to play.

Most superheroes have to overcome overwhelming odds and break their limits in order to save the day, but not Superman. Superman has no limits and instead needs to figure out how to be a god living amongst men.

For this reason, it is often hard for fans to relate to the Man of Steel. However, Christopher Reeve absolutely nailed the character.

Reeve’s Superman is both strengthened and incapacitated by his human upbringing. His Kryptonian biology might make him the strongest being in the universe, but his humanity is what makes him use his powers for good.

In “Superman II,” Supes decides to give up his powers in order to pursue a life with Lois Lane. Despite the fact that others dream of having abilities like his, Supes makes the selfish decision to abandon what can keep the world safe in order to be “normal.”

True, he does end up restoring his powers so he can duke it out with General Zod (complete with him throwing a random cellophane S).

What made Reeve a great Superman was his ability to get us to identify with an unidentifiable character. Superman constantly walked the line between what is good for others and what is good for him.

Sure, none of us can move faster than a speeding bullet, or be more powerful than a locomotive. However, throwing aside what makes us unique for the chance to be normal is something we can all understand. For that, we have Reeve to thank.

4. Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man

First, let’s do introductions:

Robert Downey Jr. was a very risky pick to play Tony Stark. His battle with addiction made him far from a slam dunk choice, and failure meant that the MCU simply wouldn’t happen. 

Luckily, Robert Downey Jr. blew expectations out of the water. If you’ve ever read an Avengers or Iron Man comic book, you probably have a decent grasp of what kind of person Tony Stark is. He’s both cocky and arrogant, but he does have a very blunt view of justice (for better or worse).

Basically, if Stark believes something is right, it’s very difficult to prove him wrong.

That scene took place right after Stark created Ultron. Even after creating what is essentially an AI-powered weapon of mass destruction, he still defends his motives and the need to create it.

This scene made people hate Stark. Nobody could believe that he would still defend his actions after creating such an evil force. Here’s the thing though: that’s exactly who Iron Man is.

Even when faced with the reality of his actions, Stark rejects that reality for his own. Guess what else? He was right!

The world did need more protection, and it did need a suit of armor. Thanos made sure of that. Although the Avengers did defeat Thanos, Stark was right in assuming the team would not be enough.

You can poke holes in MCU movies and in the Iron Man movies until the cows come home. However, at the end of the day, RDJ was right, he IS Iron Man.

3. Heath Ledger as Joker

Joker

Nope, Heath Ledger didn’t get our #1 spot.

Sure Jack Nicholson gave us a pretty unbelievable Joker. However, Heath Ledger blew Nicholson out of the water with just one chilling scene from “The Dark Knight“:

Despite what many people think, Joker is actually a very versatile character. Sure, at his core he’s a criminal who dresses up as a clown, but he can be portrayed in many different ways.

Nicholson’s approach was to make Joker act more like a gangster. Cesar Romero made Joker focus more on the clown antics and gags. Jared Leto… did whatever this was:

However, nobody even came close to match Ledger’s madness and sense of anarchy. Throughout the movie, Ledger is two steps ahead of the mob, the police, Batman, and even the audience. There is simply no reasoning behind his actions other than the fact he wants to cause chaos.

He blows up a hospital and almost gets himself killed just for a chance to make Harvey Dent turn on Gotham.

Look, we can talk about Ledger’s Oscar-winning performance all day, and show you clips from the movie, and it still might not convince you. For a last-ditch effort, we’ll try a magic trick:

2. Hugh Jackman as Wolverine

Logan

Hugh Jackman played Wolverine in nine different X-Men movies. However, he only needed to be in one to cement himself as Wolverine for all eternity.

From the start, Jackman gave us exactly what we wanted Wolverine to be. He was tough but only had the best intentions. He was strong but also weakened by his unstable mentality. He was tragic but always triumphant.

He was Logan.

Sure, Jackman was able to be an incredible action star when portraying Wolverine, but he was also able to bring some real drama to the character.

Down the road, we are probably going to get a new incarnation for most of the characters we have already named. Heck, we already know about the next Batman.

However, there is nobody else who can become Wolverine like Hugh Jackman.

At this point, you are probably wondering, “Who could possibly have the #1 spot?”

Sure, we named off some incredible talent up until now. However, the next entry was someone so good that not only does he represent one of the best parts of the movie(s), but his character has never been recast since.

1. J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson

J. Jonah Jameson

Since Tobey Maguire first put on the Spidey suit in 2002, we have had three different live-action Spider-Man, two different Gwen Stacy, three different MJ‘s, two different Harry and Norman Osborns, three different Aunt May, and two different Uncle Ben.

However, we have only had one man and one man only play J. Jonah Jameson, and for good reason.

J.K. Simmons feels like he was ripped right from the pages of the comic books. He’s hammy, he’s over-the-top, but he’s a true comic book character.

Walk over to a comic book store, and find the shelf with all the Spider-Man comics. Throw a rock at the shelf, and read whatever issue it hit. No matter what, you will see that J.K. Simmons’s portrayal was 100% spot on to the comics.

He commands the screen in every scene he’s in. He’s a miserable jerk, but you can’t help but smile every time he opens his mouth. They could have taken out an entire action sequence from one of the movies and replaced it with more J. Jonah Jameson and nobody would have complained.

You can disagree with us all you want. However, before you go throwing this list out the window, answer this one question, “Who else could have played him better?”

Honorable mention

Hellboy

Yes, it hurt us not to include Ron Perlman’s performance as Hellboy.

Perlman captured the character perfectly, giving us the perfect comic book adaptation. Unfortunately, there were just 10 choices that were better.

We still love you, Ron.

Wrapping up

Whether or not you agree with our list entirely, you can’t help but admit that these were all some stellar performances.

At the end of the day, there have been so many other great performances in superhero movies. Emma Stone was the first actress who truly was able to give Gwen Stacy the justice she deserved. Gene Hackman was the only good movie villain Superman has ever had. Chris Hemsworth gave the god of thunder the charisma and character he desperately needed.

We’re in an age where comic book movies are being taken seriously, and aren’t just popcorn thrillers for the summer. These performances are what got them to this level.

Let us know in the comments below who you think should have made the list!

Google: Pay us or your ad blocker won’t work on Chrome

Chrome’s new system hurts ad block programs and favors enterprise members.

Google Chrome

Manifest V3, a new development for Google Chrome, could spell disaster for ad blocking. 

Many ad blockers work by filtering content a certain way. When a blocker identifies an ad, it shoots it into space and you never see it. But Chrome could soon prevent those ad blockers from getting the information they need to work properly.

Google has responded to extension developers’ concerns over those changes to ad block on their forum page. However, their response came with a bit more concerning news.

“Chrome is deprecating the blocking capabilities of the webRequest API in Manifest V3, not the entire webRequest API (though blocking will still be available to enterprise deployments),” Simeon Vincent, Chrome extension developer at Google, wrote. “Extensions with appropriate permissions can still observe network requests using the webRequest API. The webRequest API’s ability to observe requests is foundational for extensions that modify their behavior based on the patterns they observe at runtime.”

Essentially what Vincent is saying is that some programs will still be able to block ads, but users would have to pay Google for that privilege. Ad blockers for free Chrome users wouldn’t work as well under the new configuration.

Back in January, Google proposed a change to Chrome that would hinder ad blocking programs such as AdGuard and uBlock Origin.

Basically, these programs blocked ads before they even popped up on the screen. The new Chrome development would stop the ad block programs’ requests since those are made before the ad is loaded onto the page.

uBlock Origin Download now ►
9

So what should I do?

If you enjoy an ad-free web-browsing experience, you have plenty of options.

The Brave browser is a logical choice. With its built-in ad blocking it can give you a nice, clean interface. You can also use your favorite Chrome extensions. And the Brave Basic Attention Token provides a way to support your favorite content providers.

Enjoy private, secure and fast browsing with Brave.

We can also recommend Firefox and Opera as great browsers with user-friendly features.

If you want to stick with Chrome, but you still want ad block, you can, but you may need to pay for Chrome Enterprise. In order to do so, you need to contact their sales team and fill out a form to make the request.

We can expect Chrome to take some backlash for this move, as they’ve already been getting it for nearly six months as it is. For current Chrome users, this might be the motivation you need to make the switch.